|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
$50 NL over 200BB\'s deep with monster draw
Guy was relatively loose over the few hands I've had with him, generally always going to showdown after I was betting on every street with top pair good kicker and he'd have some midpair good kicker or missed draw..
And not to mention is it ok here to call off stack with this big of a draw for being so deep? With 1 buyin I'd easily call it here but 2 or more made me reconsider. Poker Stars - No Limit Hold'em Cash Game - $0.25/$0.50 Blinds - 6 Players - (LegoPoker HH Converter) ThugNasty3: $50 banty: $79.25 CapitanPoker: $32.50 <font color="black">_2_4_0_0: $143.80</font> R/W Ace: $118.60 Bidicha: $58.10 <font color="black">Preflop:</font> _2_4_0_0 is dealt A[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 6[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (6 Players) CapitanPoker folds, <font color="red">_2_4_0_0 raises to $1.50</font>, R/W Ace calls $1.50, 3 folds <font color="black">Flop:</font> ($3.75) 7[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] 5[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 8[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (2 Players) <font color="red">_2_4_0_0 bets $2</font>, <font color="red">R/W Ace raises all-in to $117.10</font> |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $50 NL over 200BB\'s deep with monster draw
It really depends on if he does this with 109hh or 66 type hands
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $50 NL over 200BB\'s deep with monster draw
Withoud a read I call. You're getting excellent odds and I don't like to get fancy for 200BB versus an unknown
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $50 NL over 200BB\'s deep with monster draw
If he does do this with 9h10h I still technically have the lead right? Not to mention the better heart draw. Anyone know the %'s on this flop if he did in fact hold 9h10h?
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $50 NL over 200BB\'s deep with monster draw
Instacall
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $50 NL over 200BB\'s deep with monster draw
It's not an instacall by any means I think it is pretty close with me leaning towards fold
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $50 NL over 200BB\'s deep with monster draw
Of course if he reraised me on this flop instead of all in, there was no question in my mind I am reraising again and making it clear that I am willing to play for stacks at this point.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $50 NL over 200BB\'s deep with monster draw
This deep, I don't know if I'd call. Sure, you're probably flipping for stacks, but unless you like variance...
There isn't enough in the pot for me to love a call. If you embrace variance -- go for it. PF -- anybody else dislike the smallish raise with a loose 220 bbs guy behind you? You gotta be raising your premiums more than the normal 4bb, which would mean a fold or more bbs for me with this UTG+1. I'd like to know. If it's more a pot sweetener, well, I almost never do those -- but if there was a case for a pot sweeten raise, I guess it would be with this hand, here. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $50 NL over 200BB\'s deep with monster draw
I make it 4bb preflop but it is nothing to do with stack sizes
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $50 NL over 200BB\'s deep with monster draw
Honestly, I hate when people use the "wait for a better spot, youll get him later" argument, but Im gonna use it here. Personally, I dont wanna be flipping for stacks 200+bb deep against this muppet. If the variance doesnt bother you, go for it. Its close either way IMO.
Also, when you would go to showdown vs him, would he be raising you or a typical station? If hes a station, I wanna fold even more. |
|
|