|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Analyzing Postflop-Aggression (PT / PAHud)
Hello!
After switching to FTP i datamined a lot and now i'm wondering how to interpret the stats. I'm talking about 5-6 handed games. PAH offers the option to highlight certain stats with certain colours. When i'm multitabling the colours would help me to focus / think faster. Let's create three catagories: passive / typical / aggressiv What ranges would you choose? I'm quite new to PLO and i read in the forum that vpip/pfr are not that informational. So i leave them grey. I also added 'went to showdown' to my PAH-layout. How should the numbers be interpreted? What numbers do you consider as weak-tight laydown-larry / showdown-muppet / typical? Thanks in advance for your input. Steve |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Analyzing Postflop-Aggression (PT / PAHud)
[ QUOTE ]
showdown-muppet [/ QUOTE ] What is a showdown-muppet? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Analyzing Postflop-Aggression (PT / PAHud)
a guy who goes way to often to showdown and then most of the time shows down losers.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Analyzing Postflop-Aggression (PT / PAHud)
[ QUOTE ]
a guy who goes way to often to showdown and then most of the time shows down losers. [/ QUOTE ] Usually for these people I just make a note of them and try and figure out if there is some part of the game they are bad at. For example, are they going to bluff with bad hands (and you call) or are they going to call your nuts? I don't see where numbers will help you here. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Analyzing Postflop-Aggression (PT / PAHud)
Showdown-muppet does not include the way how someone goes to showdown (at least according to my definition).
When a very loose/passive opponent who goes to showdown very often suddenly shows unusual aggression i assume he has some kind of legitimate holding. There are also guys (the donators) who liberally raise around with more or less nothing. When they now check a somewhat draw-completing card i'm alert. When multitabling the lower limits (plo25-plo100) those stats help to get a relativley accurate picture of the opponents style i think (assuming that the typical player is more or less bad). |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Analyzing Postflop-Aggression (PT / PAHud)
BTW, I nominate you for writing a poker story for this competition: http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showfl...e=0#Post9673782
I think if you use a lot of your terms like "showdown-muppet", it will be really funny. |
|
|