![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I know these posts arent popular, but im gonna try anyway.
I've been playing poker for about 2 yrs (1yr seriously). Moved up gradually from 25nl to 200nl with reasonably conservative BR-management. I normally 6-8 table 200nl and ussually consider myself on of the better players at the table. My BR is about 15K now and I have taken shots with variable succes, think im about +1 BI over 1.5k hands, which doesnt really say anything.. I personally think there's a HUGE difference between 1/2 and 2/4, especially PF, which I personally find hard to adjust to. I find that the 1/2 players have really small PFRR ranges and limp call OOP way too often, so they're very exploitable. I also think there's alot more floating, playing back etc, especially IP. I also think im a bit too tight (19/12/4.5), to really make good money at 2/4. Almost all the regs are 24/16ish, so Im probably going to have to open up my game a bit (advice on that?) anyway, if you have any advice on adjusting to 400NL I would really appreciate it. btw: would you consider 15K roll big enough to MT 400nl? thx, <--IWS |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
play how you play, open your game up first at 1/2 and see if it works if you're trying to loosen up.
15k is fine |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Whether you play 19/12 or 24/16 has minimal effect on your winrate. Being aware of how you are perceived and reading hands well will have a huge effect on your winrate.
I personally find it easier to read people's hands if they perceive me as being pretty tight. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
Whether you play 19/12 or 24/16 has minimal effect on your winrate. [/ QUOTE ] I highly doubt this. Under the assumption that everyone you're playing is a donkey, it might be true. But if your opponents are a little tougher, you'll have a hard time playing that nitty |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think if you change it up to 19/15, you'll be fine.
but there ARE people with 12 prfr and get away with it. (and beat the game for a nice amt) |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
I think if you change it up to 19/15, you'll be fine. but there ARE people with 12 prfr and get away with it. (and beat the game for a nice amt) [/ QUOTE ] I just really like calling hands like 33-99 IP, whats would you consider main reason to RR this pf? Apart from having the initiative? IME, I have more equity in calling down, then RR, especially against people who I think I can read enough postflop, but maybe this is only true for 200nl. What about the RR range from SB/BB to BTN raise? thx |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Whether you play 19/12 or 24/16 has minimal effect on your winrate. [/ QUOTE ] I highly doubt this. Under the assumption that everyone you're playing is a donkey, it might be true. But if your opponents are a little tougher, you'll have a hard time playing that nitty [/ QUOTE ] this is so wrong. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Whether you play 19/12 or 24/16 has minimal effect on your winrate. [/ QUOTE ] I highly doubt this. Under the assumption that everyone you're playing is a donkey, it might be true. But if your opponents are a little tougher, you'll have a hard time playing that nitty [/ QUOTE ] this is so wrong. [/ QUOTE ] qft, 400 nl is not as super tough as you are making it seem |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
15k is good.
when taking shots i find it easier to play a few tables at my normal stakes and a couple more at the next level at first. as i begin to feel more comfortable ill start 4 tabling for a day or say then start 8 tabling soon after i get a feel for the stakes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
15k is good. when taking shots i find it easier to play a few tables at my normal stakes and a couple more at the next level at first. as i begin to feel more comfortable ill start 4 tabling for a day or say then start 8 tabling soon after i get a feel for the stakes [/ QUOTE ] 4-tables are the absolute minimum. maybe its a good idea to start 4 tabling first, although it's pretty boring. |
![]() |
|
|