|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Apathy style theory question SSNL version - Checking flop in the blind
6-max. 100BB stacks. You are the BB. Someone (not the SB) raises and you call.
How much, if any, EV are you sacrificing by always 100% of the time checking the flop? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Apathy style theory question SSNL version - Checking flop in the b
i check this flop pretty damn close to 100% of the time.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Apathy style theory question SSNL version - Checking flop in the b
i dont see how you could say always 100% of the time.. like if you spike a set, or two pair, on a draw heavy board, how do you not lead out.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Apathy style theory question SSNL version - Checking flop in the b
game dependant
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Apathy style theory question SSNL version - Checking flop in the b
[ QUOTE ]
game dependant [/ QUOTE ] This answer is as useless and not the point of this type of thread as is possible. The idea is to discuss the kinds of things it depends on, yo. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Apathy style theory question SSNL version - Checking flop in the b
[ QUOTE ]
i dont see how you could say always 100% of the time.. like if you spike a set, or two pair, on a draw heavy board, how do you not lead out. [/ QUOTE ] If villain cbets 100% of the time, leading out is terrible independent of your holding and the board. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Apathy style theory question SSNL version - Checking flop in the b
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] i dont see how you could say always 100% of the time.. like if you spike a set, or two pair, on a draw heavy board, how do you not lead out. [/ QUOTE ] If villain cbets 100% of the time, leading out is terrible independent of your holding and the board. [/ QUOTE ] Actually thats exactly what one my posts was about and the end result of the thread seems to be that even when someone c-bets 100% of the time you should still lead some hands. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Apathy style theory question SSNL version - Checking flop in the b
[ QUOTE ]
i dont see how you could say always 100% of the time.. like if you spike a set, or two pair, on a draw heavy board, how do you not lead out. [/ QUOTE ] If theres a maniac who will bluff his stack away, leading would be a big mistake. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Apathy style theory question SSNL version - Checking flop in the b
[ QUOTE ]
- I have a marginal made hand or a weak draw and I think my opponents are weak [/ QUOTE ] How do you know he's weak when all he's done is raising PF? If he's weak, why not c/r or stop 'n go? Ship the free money... |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Apathy style theory question SSNL version - Checking flop in the b
Master, no, its not useless, its true. This is about as broad of a topic as you can say, and there is NO possible way to classify the amount of EV lost by never leading. However, what I meant is it depends on your own game, not the flow of the game, how much you'll lose. A good player oop will lose less, a bad player will lose more cuz his ability to manipulate the pot size, and therefore his EV, will be lower. A good player would be able to take this singular line and using bet sizing manipulate the pot.
<3 |
|
|