Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Micro Stakes Limit
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-26-2007, 10:14 PM
HighSteaks HighSteaks is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 658
Default Small top pair in raised pot.

I posted in this hand - pretty much got commited, and then was unsure what to do on this flop - suggestions appreciated.

PokerRoom 1/2 Hold'em (10 handed) internettexasholdem.com

Preflop: Hero is BB with 9[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], A[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img].
<font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, UTG+1 calls, UTG+2 calls, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, <font color="#CC3333">MP2 raises</font>, <font color="#666666">2 folds</font>, Button calls, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, Hero calls, <font color="#CC3333">UTG+1 3-bets</font>, UTG+2 calls, MP2 calls, Button calls, Hero calls.

Flop: (15.50 SB) 9[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], 5[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], 3[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(5 players)</font>
Hero checks, UTG+1 checks, <font color="#CC3333">UTG+2 bets</font>, <font color="#CC3333">MP2 raises</font>, Button folds, Hero ????
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-26-2007, 10:18 PM
Aaron W. Aaron W. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Henderson, NV
Posts: 8,076
Default Re: Small top pair in raised pot.

3-bet, hold your breath, and see what happens next.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-26-2007, 10:31 PM
snikeris snikeris is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 61
Default Re: Small top pair in raised pot.

why 3-bet instead of call and re-evaluate?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-26-2007, 10:36 PM
BigBadBabar BigBadBabar is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: working on my 5k post yo
Posts: 5,000
Default Re: Small top pair in raised pot.

wow, i dump it immediately on that flop, given utg+1s limpreraise preflop and his check on the flop. 3betting is better than calling as my second option.

snik--because then if someone caps over us or a lot more action goes in we know we are beat, and can fold. if we just call call call all these bets and raises and the board keeps coming random low cards then we're gonna have to see showdown without ever really knowing where we are in the hand.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-26-2007, 10:58 PM
BigBadBabar BigBadBabar is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: working on my 5k post yo
Posts: 5,000
Default Re: Small top pair in raised pot.

i see the merits in 3betting obviously, huge pot coming and we have a decent hand that is vulnerable and we want KQ and JT type hands out of there now. I am always just leery of the limpreraise. when he checks the flop i just got a feeling he's about to raise everyone again. maybe this is a result of my downswing. I suppose even if we're behind we have 3-4ish outs to improve on the turn.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-27-2007, 03:50 AM
Donkey Kong Donkey Kong is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Firing Barrels
Posts: 217
Default Re: Small top pair in raised pot.

Bah. Ugly situation. UTG+2 might be betting a FD, but MP2 certainly got something. And the PF limp-3-bettor is yet to act behind you. Seems like you're toast here.I'd fold this flop and move on to the next hand as I really dont like getting stuck in these kinds of situations.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-27-2007, 04:14 AM
BionicComma BionicComma is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 356
Default Re: Small top pair in raised pot.

I remember this example from SSHE. As I recall, the standard ABC line for TP weak kicker multiway vs a raise is to fold unless you have good draws to improve or a chance to isolate. Also, it depends on how good your TP is. Here you have a good kicker with a marginal TP, which is a trickier situation but still has the same evaluation criteria.

From an EV perspective, what are you beating (or could you beat later) that you want to c/r the flop to a 3bet? Without reads you can't assume that flop raiser is trying to isolate. Pitch this hand in this situation.

If I suspected the guy with position was raising something like overs or TP with a weak kicker as an isolation play, the 3bet lets you squeeze out the guys in the middle.

The fact that the A came on the turn doesn't factor in. That card culd have easily been a T-K and then where would you be? Not to mention that you are in against some hefty PF raising.

Fold to the flop raise.

I think the most important point to make in this thread is to make good decisions and dont second guess just because you missed a chance to get lucky.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-26-2007, 10:56 PM
Faluzure Faluzure is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 178
Default Re: Small top pair in raised pot.

Such weird action from UTG+1, at first it looks like AA or KK, now the flop check, wtf. UTG+2 seems to likely have a flush draw, and MP2 is representing an overpair, but not KK or AA, probably not QQ either. I think we're looking at TT, maybe JJ and should fold, unless MP2 is a psycho. With no reads, I fold, or at worst call and reevaluate on turn. I never 3 bet here.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-27-2007, 03:47 AM
HighSteaks HighSteaks is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 658
Default Re: Small top pair in raised pot.

Check out what UTG 1 had [img]/images/graemlins/crazy.gif[/img]

PokerRoom 1/2 Hold'em (10 handed) internettexasholdem.com

Preflop: Hero is BB with 9[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], A[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img].
<font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, UTG+1 calls, UTG+2 calls, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, <font color="#CC3333">MP2 raises</font>, <font color="#666666">2 folds</font>, Button calls, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, Hero calls, <font color="#CC3333">UTG+1 3-bets</font>, UTG+2 calls, MP2 calls, Button calls, Hero calls.

Flop: (15.50 SB) 9[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], 5[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], 3[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(5 players)</font>
Hero checks, UTG+1 checks, <font color="#CC3333">UTG+2 bets</font>, <font color="#CC3333">MP2 raises</font>, Button folds, Hero folds, UTG+1 calls, UTG+2 calls.

Turn: (10.75 BB) A[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font>
UTG+1 checks, UTG+2 checks, MP2 checks.

River: (10.75 BB) Q[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font>
UTG+1 checks, UTG+2 checks, MP2 checks.

Final Pot: 10.75 BB

Results in white below: <font color="#FFFFFF">
UTG+1 has Th 7h (high card, ace).
UTG+2 has 7s Js (high card, ace).
MP2 has Qs Ks (one pair, queens).
Outcome: MP2 wins 10.75 BB. </font>
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-27-2007, 05:27 AM
martybonus martybonus is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: knife-wreennnnnch!
Posts: 555
Default Re: Small top pair in raised pot.

:tl;dr grunch:

I spose the PF call is okay. It'll be 5 way to the flop. I guess you were stuck calling the third bet as well. But it's still 5 players in the pot. Someone with AA-QQ or AK is stoked. I think we're in trouble here unless the flop is very tasty. Would you coldcall wiht A9s in EP?

autfold on the flop. SUPER easy fold. Do you really see your weak TPTK standing up for the next two streets against PF and flop raisers? Cos I don't. Villains are very probably holding overpairs. This is a definite fold. It seems very, very unlikely you're going to win this with a pair of 9's. What in your villains's PFR and PF 3-bang range do you have beat?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.