|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
200/400 Durrr vs PA
Why did PA(Dampest Hawk) bet river here? I don't understand this hand he can win showdown but gets called by any A. This didn't make sense to me what do you guys think? Is a naked Ace supposed to check fold river here?
Full Tilt Poker Game #1777066873: Table Canfield (6 max) - $200/$400 - No Limit Hold'em - 17:05:39 ET - 2007/02/11 Seat 1: pareshjain ($43,000) Seat 3: durrrr ($48,448.50) Seat 5: TerrorOfSweden ($16,000) Seat 6: Dampest_Hawk ($51,798) durrrr posts the small blind of $200 TerrorOfSweden posts the big blind of $400 The button is in seat #1 *** HOLE CARDS *** Dampest_Hawk raises to $800 pareshjain calls $800 durrrr calls $600 TerrorOfSweden folds *** FLOP *** [Ad 2h Ah] durrrr checks Dampest_Hawk checks pareshjain checks *** TURN *** [Ad 2h Ah] [Jd] durrrr checks Dampest_Hawk checks pareshjain bets $700 durrrr raises to $3,750 Dampest_Hawk raises to $9,600 pareshjain folds durrrr calls $5,850 *** RIVER *** [Ad 2h Ah Jd] [8c] durrrr checks Dampest_Hawk bets $22,700 durrrr has 15 seconds left to act durrrr calls $22,700 *** SHOW DOWN *** Dampest_Hawk shows [Js Ts] (two pair, Aces and Jacks) durrrr shows [5c Ac] (three of a kind, Aces) durrrr wins the pot ($68,098) with three of a kind, Aces *** SUMMARY *** Total pot $68,100 | Rake $2 Board: [Ad 2h Ah Jd 8c] Seat 1: pareshjain (button) folded on the Turn Seat 3: durrrr (small blind) showed [5c Ac] and won ($68,098) with three of a kind, Aces Seat 5: TerrorOfSweden (big blind) folded before the Flop Seat 6: Dampest_Hawk showed [Js Ts] and lost with two pair, Aces and Jacks |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 200/400 Durrr vs PA
he though he had the best hand so he bet for value
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 200/400 Durrr vs PA
It was a spew.
The turn wasn't a bad place to bluff, but once duff calls it's hard to see him folding an ace on the river. If dampest thought he had the best hand on the river then he's a moron. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 200/400 Durrr vs PA
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 200/400 Durrr vs PA
i always thought dampest was lodden. had a feeling when i played him at UB before. could be wrong, just what i always thought based on how he played. i didn't read that link above so this could be way off base.
tc |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 200/400 Durrr vs PA
Lodden = LuckyULSA? Confirmed or not...?
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 200/400 Durrr vs PA
i watched this hand. i feel like ppl rarely would check this flop with an A in middle position (edit--assuming they're the pf raiser). sorta a confusing hand--to me he was repping quads, A2, 222, or JJJ (but i feel like he'd bet the flop with JJ). dunno, but that's what went through my head when i watched the hand (obv from durrrr's perspective he can't have quads...so it's either A2, 222, JJJ, or a bluff).
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 200/400 Durrr vs PA
he's def trying to get him off a mid-weak ace....not sure if I like it tho, especially given dampest's crazy image
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 200/400 Durrr vs PA
Looks like he's trying to get him off the exact type of hand he has. I dont like his turn line with his river line, though. If he really had, say, AK and got check/raised on the turn, seems like he'd probably call the turn instead of re-raising. I think this might have been more effecgive if he had called the turn and then raised the river. But of course it's just a question of levels. I mean, maybe he would re-raise AK because durr would think he'd call, so... whatever. You really can't get too much just from looking at one nosebleed hand. It's all about recent history, etc.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 200/400 Durrr vs PA
[ QUOTE ]
I dont like his turn line with his river line, though. If he really had, say, AK and got check/raised on the turn, seems like he'd probably call the turn instead of re-raising. [/ QUOTE ] He didnt get checkraised, he check raised a bettor and raiser. |
|
|