|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Older article analyzing Stop n Go\'s
Does anyone remember the author or have a copy of the article? It apears to be older than the retained issues.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Older article analyzing Stop n Go\'s
I could be wrong, but wasn't it by TrojanRabbit?
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Older article analyzing Stop n Go\'s
[ QUOTE ]
Right, it's me. Until I get a real website, I've got all my old articles stored here for anyone who wants them. Tysen [/ QUOTE ] Thanks for storing those articles, Tysen. In light of the Mathematics of Poker, I think it's obvious in hindsight that 88 is a bad example hand; it is clearly +cEV to push that hand from the BB vs a loose button raise. Strictly in terms of chip EV, I think that the value of the stop n go comes in allowing you go play hands which are not profitable to push over the top of a button raise, where the button is callling 100%. Stuff like K4o and Q5s and 86s. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Older article analyzing Stop n Go\'s
link doesn't work for me
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Older article analyzing Stop n Go\'s
[ QUOTE ]
link doesn't work for me [/ QUOTE ] Still works for me... Try going to google base and searching for "Tysen Streib" |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|