|
|
|
|
#1
02-07-2006, 02:58 AM
|
|||
|
|||
tiny tiny survey (personaly curiosity)
I've just looked through my current pt database (looking up something to answer in another thread) and found out my biggest money makers are pairs (duh) and AXs (scattered between my pairs), since I've noticed a bunch of threads lately talking about trouble hands with small suited aces I'm posting to find out how Axs has been treating the general population of SSNL.
|
|
#3
02-07-2006, 03:12 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: tiny tiny survey (personaly curiosity)
[ QUOTE ]
I'm playing about break-even with AXs. [/ QUOTE ]
|
|
#4
02-07-2006, 03:21 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: tiny tiny survey (personaly curiosity)
This thread is genius.Biggest loses with QJs, TJs over last 10k hands. How the [censored] is that possible.
Yeah ok 10k is nothing
|
|
#7
02-07-2006, 03:28 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: tiny tiny survey (personaly curiosity)
[ QUOTE ]
-0.01 bb/100 with Axs (where x<T) 30k hands full [/ QUOTE ] latest 30k: 0.5ptbb/100
|
|
#8
02-07-2006, 03:07 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: tiny tiny survey (personaly curiosity)
Fallen-
These are the biggest winners in descending order from my biggest database (30k on stars 25NL about 20k full-ring 10k 6-max.) I really need to play more. AA [img]/images/graemlins/shocked.gif[/img] KK TT JJ AKo AQs A3s (lol) A8s A9s AJs 99 64s [img]/images/graemlins/blush.gif[/img] AQo KQs 55 J9s ATs 33 A7s
|
|
#9
02-07-2006, 03:26 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: tiny tiny survey (personaly curiosity)
When you say Axs, do you exclude AKs? AQs?
Funny thing is Im doing good if you take AJs+ out of the equation [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] Thank you for making me aware of a big leak - overplaying big slick.
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
