|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
#1 indicator a girl will sex you on the first date
i do believe it is dipping her finger in the ranch dressing at Chili's and then licking it off sumptiously
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: #1 indicator a girl will sex you on the first date
for me it's a tattoo on her ass
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: #1 indicator a girl will sex you on the first date
on her ass or the one above her ass? both are solid indicators, the latter more so, however that will still vary girl to girl. both teases and [censored] would go for that type of tattoo, but not everygirl smears ranch dressing all over her lips.
you see? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: #1 indicator a girl will sex you on the first date
I think you meant to post this in BBV.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: #1 indicator a girl will sex you on the first date
When she gets naked and tells you to f her.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: #1 indicator a girl will sex you on the first date
When we agree on a price beforehand?
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: #1 indicator a girl will sex you on the first date
[ QUOTE ]
When she gets naked and tells you to f her. [/ QUOTE ] I think this wins. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: #1 indicator a girl will sex you on the first date
[ QUOTE ]
on her ass or the one above her ass? both are solid indicators, the latter more so, however that will still vary girl to girl. both teases and [censored] would go for that type of tattoo, but not everygirl smears ranch dressing all over her lips. you see? [/ QUOTE ] I agree the Tramp Stamp on the lower back is very reliable. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: #1 indicator a girl will sex you on the first date
[ QUOTE ]
for me it's a tattoo on her lower back [/ QUOTE ] "Tattoo on the lower back? Might as well be a bull's eye." |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: #1 indicator a girl will sex you on the first date
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] for me it's a tattoo on her lower back [/ QUOTE ] "Tattoo on the lower back? Might as well be a bull's eye." [/ QUOTE ] might as well be 3/4 of every 20 something women in america. i wouldn't classify that many as sure thing first daters but of course there has got to be a correlation. |
|
|