![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hey guys,
I play on UB and partypoker (i'm cdn). Just wondering how the difficulty and table selection (# of tables available) are for 200NL to 600NL on full tilt poker. Im strongly considering switching over to FTP after being with party for several years. If anyone can give any input on how FTP plays compared to partypoker now (if they still play on party), or FTP now vs. Party b4 the legislation. Thanks, any input would be greatly appreciated. edit: the games on pp are drying up and many regs at the tables even as low as 200 and 400 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
FTP is much nittier than party. Lots of fish, but nothing compared to party. The games wont be quite as nitty as UB, and will be alot fishier. Plenty of tables. Also, the FTP games arent nearly as aggro as the Stars games.
This is referring to party then and now. The games now are actually alot easier. No american nits |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
i gotta move to canada to play on party [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The FT games suck.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
The FT games suck. [/ QUOTE ] yea 3/6 sucks, but 2/4 is sooooooooooo soft with a few exceptions...........you being one of them. 1/2 is super soft obviously. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
The FT games suck. [/ QUOTE ] |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't know about FT, but I play on PP. I think the NL 400 and NL 600 games er pretty soft. I'm not considering changing site anytime soon.
|
![]() |
|
|