****Official tOSU/Florida BCS National Title Game thread****

#1 12-02-2006, 11:07 PM

With USC's loss, and Florida's tougher schedule than Mich, I guess this will be a done-deal by the time the votes are in and the BCS computers put Florida ahead of Mich.

So, what's the line?? tOSU -10 ??

ASPoker8 · #2 12-02-2006, 11:16 PM

This thread is worthless until the rankings come out.

Please.

#3 12-02-2006, 11:29 PM

[ QUOTE ]
This thread is worthless until the rankings come out.

Please.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm a Michigan fan (check my posts), but it would be naive to think that Florida beating an 8th ranked team is not going to put them ahead of an idle Mich.

ligastar · #4 12-02-2006, 11:18 PM

[ QUOTE ]
With USC's loss, and Florida's tougher schedule than Mich, I guess this will be a done-deal by the time the votes are in and the BCS computers put Florida ahead of Mich.

So, what's the line?? tOSU -10 ??

[/ QUOTE ]

Here is the thread I was looking for. I'm looking forward to the Leak vs Smith match-up. I think the opening line with be Ohio St by 9.5.

srjunkacct · #5 12-02-2006, 11:19 PM

[ QUOTE ]
With USC's loss, and Florida's tougher schedule than Mich, I guess this will be a done-deal by the time the votes are in and the BCS computers put Florida ahead of Mich.

[/ QUOTE ]

Before the SEC championship game, Sagarin had Michigan's schedule as #13 and Florida's as #27.

SoloAJ · #6 12-02-2006, 11:30 PM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
With USC's loss, and Florida's tougher schedule than Mich, I guess this will be a done-deal by the time the votes are in and the BCS computers put Florida ahead of Mich.

[/ QUOTE ]

Before the SEC championship game, Sagarin had Michigan's schedule as #13 and Florida's as #27.

[/ QUOTE ]

And Florida played the schedule against the toughest opponenet win percentage.

bottomset · #7 12-02-2006, 11:33 PM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
With USC's loss, and Florida's tougher schedule than Mich, I guess this will be a done-deal by the time the votes are in and the BCS computers put Florida ahead of Mich.

[/ QUOTE ]

Before the SEC championship game, Sagarin had Michigan's schedule as #13 and Florida's as #27.

[/ QUOTE ]

And Florida played the schedule against the toughest opponenet win percentage.

[/ QUOTE ]

yeah a [censored] of cupcake nonconference matches

SoloAJ · #8 12-02-2006, 11:37 PM

Including a 4 win UCF team....

It isn't like those cupcake matches didn't hurt the stat I mentioned...Not to mention their rivalry game against a .500 FSU that lowered that stat too.

SharkTank43 · #9 12-02-2006, 11:42 PM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
With USC's loss, and Florida's tougher schedule than Mich, I guess this will be a done-deal by the time the votes are in and the BCS computers put Florida ahead of Mich.

[/ QUOTE ]

Before the SEC championship game, Sagarin had Michigan's schedule as #13 and Florida's as #27.

[/ QUOTE ]

And Florida played the schedule against the toughest opponenet win percentage.

[/ QUOTE ]

yeah a [censored] of cupcake nonconference matches

[/ QUOTE ]

What does this have to do with the fact that Fla. played the schedule with the highest opponent win %?

bottomset · #10 12-02-2006, 11:58 PM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
With USC's loss, and Florida's tougher schedule than Mich, I guess this will be a done-deal by the time the votes are in and the BCS computers put Florida ahead of Mich.

[/ QUOTE ]

Before the SEC championship game, Sagarin had Michigan's schedule as #13 and Florida's as #27.

[/ QUOTE ]

And Florida played the schedule against the toughest opponenet win percentage.

[/ QUOTE ]

yeah a [censored] of cupcake nonconference matches

[/ QUOTE ]

What does this have to do with the fact that Fla. played the schedule with the highest opponent win %?

[/ QUOTE ]

because its artificially inflated, Michigan has a tougher SOS