|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Do you listen to "The Circuit" | |||
| yes |
   
|
76 | 54.68% |
| occasionally |
  
|
26 | 18.71% |
| no |
  
|
37 | 26.62% |
| Voters: 139. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
11-02-2006, 03:44 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Is Curtis Martin a definite HOFer?
I've assumed he was a lock, but today I hear that obnoxious moron Erik Kuselias saying he doesn't belong, that the NFL HOF is reserved for the elite of the elite, and Martin is just a 'compiler' who was never the best RB in the league.
Is he crazy, or onto something? Rundown: 4th in all-time rushing yards, 11th in rushing TDs, 5 Pro Bowls, 1 rushing title, no rings, one SB appearance. Good character guy, amazing work ethic, but not a real dynamic personality. 
|
|
#2
11-02-2006, 03:48 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Is Curtis Martin a definite HOFer?
This ain't baseball. The football HOF isn't as picky.
|
|
#3
11-02-2006, 03:54 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Is Curtis Martin a definite HOFer?
[ QUOTE ]
This ain't baseball. The football HOF isn't as picky. [/ QUOTE ] You couldn't be more wrong. Football HOF is WAY more exclusive than Baseball.
|
|
#4
11-02-2006, 03:56 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Is Curtis Martin a definite HOFer?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] This ain't baseball. The football HOF isn't as picky. [/ QUOTE ] You couldn't be more wrong. Football HOF is WAY more exclusive than Baseball. [/ QUOTE ] I predict 30 pages! Gogogo!
|
|
#5
11-02-2006, 04:39 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Is Curtis Martin a definite HOFer?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] This ain't baseball. The football HOF isn't as picky. [/ QUOTE ] You couldn't be more wrong. Football HOF is WAY more exclusive than Baseball. [/ QUOTE ] QFT
|
|
#6
11-02-2006, 10:41 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Is Curtis Martin a definite HOFer?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] This ain't baseball. The football HOF isn't as picky. [/ QUOTE ] You couldn't be more wrong. Football HOF is WAY more exclusive than Baseball. [/ QUOTE ] QFT [/ QUOTE ] Correct me if I'm wrong: Pro Football HOF inducts about five or six guys every year. Baseball HOF lets in one or two guys every year.
|
|
#7
11-02-2006, 11:30 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Is Curtis Martin a definite HOFer?
[ QUOTE ]
Correct me if I'm wrong: Pro Football HOF inducts about five or six guys every year. Baseball HOF lets in one or two guys every year. [/ QUOTE ] The Baseball HOF has been around a lot longer, therefore it has a lot more players in it. The Football HOF has a lot of "catching up" to do with older players. Many of the players they are inducting every year are older players, not guys that retired recently. The baseball HOF has already inducted all those older players over time. So in a sense, that makes the football HOF much more exclusive.
|
|
#8
11-05-2006, 02:38 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Is Curtis Martin a definite HOFer?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] This ain't baseball. The football HOF isn't as picky. [/ QUOTE ] You couldn't be more wrong. Football HOF is WAY more exclusive than Baseball. [/ QUOTE ] QFT [/ QUOTE ] Correct me if I'm wrong: Pro Football HOF inducts about five or six guys every year. Baseball HOF lets in one or two guys every year. [/ QUOTE ]But aren't there a lot more players on a NFL roster than a MLB roster?
|
|
#9
11-02-2006, 08:12 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Is Curtis Martin a definite HOFer?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] This ain't baseball. The football HOF isn't as picky. [/ QUOTE ] You couldn't be more wrong. Football HOF is WAY more exclusive than Baseball. [/ QUOTE ] This is correct. Baseball has wayyyyy too many guys
|
|
#10
11-02-2006, 09:16 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Is Curtis Martin a definite HOFer?
He is crazy. CuMa is a lock.
It seems like forever ago, but he won the rushing title in 2004 (maybe Alexander should have eeked him out by a yard - but that doesn't mean it wasn't deserving).
|
|
|
|
Hybrid Mode
