|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Using interaccount transfers
Since most sites allow P2P tranferring of funds, why could you not send your friend in Norway money to put in his account, and then he can transfer it to yours? This could be done informally, or by some foreign entity that is set up for this purpose. The distinction being that they put the money in their account at the site, then make the transfer.
That is only one of many ways around this restriction, I'm very perplexed as to why Party was so hasty. For them to drop back 10 and punt their entire gravy train, they must have an extremely well devised Plan B. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Using interaccount transfers
idk, maybe because if u have a US address u will not be allowed to sit at any betting table?
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Using interaccount transfers
But that's not prohinited in the legislation, that's the point.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Using interaccount transfers
But Party is doing it on their own volition.
Why are people worried about maintaining their Party accounts? The sites that still accept US players will have the biggest volume. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Using interaccount transfers
Ok?
Its not prohibited in the bill? This bill made online poker not .000001% more illegal. It made transactions TO the accounts by banks and CC's illegal. How does it help me to play because my british friend can send my account money, on a site that deosnt allow me to play. Its still quite easy to get money in, thats not the problem. The problen is out sites going away |
|
|