Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Sporting Events
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-17-2006, 12:00 PM
Kneel B4 Zod Kneel B4 Zod is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Nobody roots for Goliath
Posts: 11,725
Default Strikeout question

Strikeouts are often said to be no worse than other outs, from the hitters perspective. It looks ugly and doesn't advance runners, but there is no chance of DP.

Meanwhile, getting strikeouts is considered a key success factor for pitchers.

is this a contradiction? or is there something I'm not understanding?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-17-2006, 12:06 PM
kyleb kyleb is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: the death of baseball
Posts: 10,765
Default Re: Strikeout question

As a pitcher: Once the ball is in play, pitchers have very little control over where it falls. By striking batters out, they reduce their dependence on luck.

As a hitter: Strikeouts can be very bad - people who have poor secondary skills and need to bat .300 to be useful (e.g. Jeff Francoeur, Juan Pierre, etc) suffer greatly from striking out. Hitters like Adam Dunn who strike out a ridiculous amount of times isn't so bad, because the reason he strikes out is the same reason he hits a dickload of home runs. He also walks a bunch, mitigating the reason to hit for average.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-17-2006, 12:11 PM
Jack of Arcades Jack of Arcades is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 13,859
Default Re: Strikeout question



Picture every batter in the major leagues having more or less the same ability to get a hit when they put a ball in play. That is, if Cesar Izturis hits the ball, it's going to be a hit as often if Adam Dunn hits the ball. In this case, what would be important in evaluating hitters? 1) how much they walk 2) how much power they have, and 3) how much the strikeout, since strikeouts will have a direct correlation with their batting average.

This is more or less the picture with major league starting pitchers. It's not exact, of course, but the range in pitcher abilities to control the batting average on balls in play (BABIP) is far smaller than the hitters'. Thus, striking out many batters is a huge advantage for pitchers. For batters, however, a guy like Adam Dunn can crush the ball every time he makes contact.

All it takes it to sort the leaderboard by strikeouts for both pitchers and hitters. You look at the pitchers with the most strikeouts and all of them are damned good pitchers. Sort by strikeouts for hitters and you really couldn't find much of a relationship...
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-17-2006, 07:30 PM
TheNoodleMan TheNoodleMan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Not using the back button
Posts: 6,873
Default Re: Strikeout question

[ QUOTE ]



All it takes it to sort the leaderboard by strikeouts for both pitchers and hitters. You look at the pitchers with the most strikeouts and all of them are damned good pitchers. Sort by strikeouts for hitters and you really couldn't find much of a relationship...

[/ QUOTE ]

Hitters vs. Pitchers
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-17-2006, 08:28 PM
THAY3R THAY3R is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: The Great White Hope
Posts: 9,755
Default Re: Strikeout question

It appears that the League Leaders in Strikeouts for hitters are mostly pretty damn good.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-17-2006, 08:57 PM
crockpot crockpot is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: /goggles fill up with tears / oh crap hold on can\'t see anything
Posts: 4,980
Default Re: Strikeout question

[ QUOTE ]
It appears that the League Leaders in Strikeouts for hitters are mostly pretty damn good.

[/ QUOTE ]

there's a selection bias here. for example, search for the worst-fielding shortstops over recent years and you will find a bunch of guys whose bats kept them in the lineup, like jeter and mike young. guys who field poorly and can't hit don't stick at the position. of the guys who K themselves silly, the good ones will hold down everyday jobs, and the others will find themselves working out their problems in AAA.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-18-2006, 07:50 PM
LionelHutz00 LionelHutz00 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,662
Default Re: Strikeout question

[ QUOTE ]


Picture every batter in the major leagues having more or less the same ability to get a hit when they put a ball in play. That is, if Cesar Izturis hits the ball, it's going to be a hit as often if Adam Dunn hits the ball.

[/ QUOTE ]

Is this true for hitters too? I know that studies show that BABIP is unpredictable for 99% of pitchers, but is it the same for hitters?

Just from looking at some career stats of a few guys, it seems like it's not true for hitters. (BABIP = (H-HR)/(AB-HR-SO), right?):
A-Rod: .327
Dunn: .294
Izturis: .289
Jose Valentin: .273
Pujols: .324

I have a feeling that these numbers aren't the result of Pujols and A-Rod being the luckiest guys in baseball.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-18-2006, 08:17 PM
Jack of Arcades Jack of Arcades is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 13,859
Default Re: Strikeout question

Of course it isn't. You had to ask? My post made it clear it wasn't.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-19-2006, 04:31 AM
Propertarian Propertarian is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: FOOD It puts me in a good mood
Posts: 1,867
Default Re: Strikeout question

It's not true for hitters.

[ QUOTE ]
I have a feeling that these numbers aren't the result of Pujols and A-Rod being the luckiest guys in baseball.

[/ QUOTE ] You don't need a feeling...we can show this is not based on luck statistically...AROD has, what, 7000 PAs in his career? There is probably less than a one in one thousand the difference between Valentin and AROD in BABIP is luck.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-17-2006, 12:59 PM
Paluka Paluka is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: New York
Posts: 5,114
Default Re: Strikeout question

Strikeouts are a predictor of success for a pitcher, moreso than a key to success. Those aren't really the same thing. I think it is stupid that strikeouts are taken into account by Cy Young voters.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.