|
View Poll Results: total interceptions 1.5 | |||
over | 6 | 60.00% | |
under | 4 | 40.00% | |
Voters: 10. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Lead or c/r with relative position
Situations like this example have been up lately a few times in MSNL , and it seems like most players there (and also Sklansky in his new book) prefer a c/r. Therefor I am intrested to see how you HSNL players look at this.
I definitely think leading is superior because all other lines show so much strength. One of the downside of course is that a c/r (or c/c) might get a continuation bet in and maybe a call or two or a raise in between. The only time I prefer the c/r is if I or the PFR is like 50bbs deep. Lets say for example: What is your play here in general? $1000 stacks Party 5/10 6-handed Preflop: Hero is BB with 4[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 4[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] UTG raises to 40, 1 fold, CO calls, Button calls, 1 fold, Hero calls Flop: ($165, 4 players) 4[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] T[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] Q[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] Hero..? Comments on the subject are appreciated, as well as maybe some circumstances that change your standard option to the other one, for example flop structures or player types involved. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Lead or c/r with relative position
So very player dependant; I hate the c/r though (almost never do that), but I'm definately c/c:ing a fair amount here.
How I play here has much to do with the players tendencies to fire 3-barrels etc. Against bad/non-thinking (preferably not aggro enough to fire away 3-barrels) players it is just fine leading away, but good ones will realize if you overdo this since the board is so dry. I like a c/c, hoping that turn tours out to be a somewhat connected card and a backdoorflushdraw, so that I can lead turn and represent a pair that turned into a combodraw which I opted not to c/r. This will make player raise you w/ both good and bad hands alike thinking you have exactly what you represent, which is of course a good result. Against players 3-barreling alot I might just c/c 2 streets occasionally/from time to time, and c/r river obv depending on how turn/river turned out. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Lead or c/r with relative position
I've been doing alot of thinking about three-handed pots with a preflop raiser you are out of position against. Position is of course only one consideration in deciding whether to check or lead with a strong hand, but I believe preference should be given in something like this order:
LEAD 1) Hero - Caller - PFraiser 2) Hero - PFraiser - Caller (above) 3) Caller - Hero - PFraiser (above) CHECK This is assuming that our PF raiser is aggressive and the caller is solid. Conversely, when leading with draws and marginal hands positional considerations are reversed. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Lead or c/r with relative position
player dependent though. if you have someone who is going to raise us here thinking we've have a marginal hand or that we're playing weak and would automatically lay down most one pair hands. then i would bet, get raised, call prb and lead the turn. if he's cbetting 100% of the time, i would cc and hope a good double barrel card falls, if it does, i might check again, if not, i would usu lead the turn i think (again player dependent, but probably less so since by this point in the hand)
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Lead or c/r with relative position
Actually I thought this hand was with only two or max three players. Three barreling doesn't really become much of an option/issue when it's 4 to the flop, since PFR generally isn't betting missed into 3 guys, at least not when two guys haven't acted yet.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Lead or c/r with relative position
I also misread the post and thought it was three-handed. That pretty much makes my post meaningless.
The more players the more I would tend to lead, for obvious reasons: 1) greater possibility someone has a strong second best hand 2) greater possibility a straight draw is out there 3) lesser possibility of the preflop raiser betting for you when he misses the flop |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Lead or c/r with relative position
Oh man, it depends on so many things. Right now we know nothing of either three players and your history at the table.
Against standard loose/overplaying players, check-raising the field seems good; as the raiser is to your immediate left. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Depends....
if I am against a bad player, I like to check raise. If I am against a solid player, I like to lead.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Lead or c/r with relative position
checking with the intention of raising is worlds different than checking with the intention of calling.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Lead or c/r with relative position
leading this flop looks pretty strong to me...
|
|
|