Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Micro Stakes Limit
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-28-2006, 11:27 AM
Ampelmann Ampelmann is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: lol donkaments
Posts: 1,652
Default TP no kicker + BDFD, call flop?

I haven't played many hands, but the table seemed pretty loose (this hand is an indication for that). The only player I know to be somewhat decent is the CO (and he folds anyway).

Paradise Poker 0.25/0.50 Hold'em (9 handed) Hand History Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com (Format: 2+2 Forums)

Preflop: Hero is SB with 3[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], T[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]. MP2 posts a blind of $0.25.
UTG calls, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, MP1 calls, MP2 (poster) checks, MP3 calls, CO calls, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, Hero completes, BB checks.

Flop: (7 SB) 7[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], 9[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], T[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(7 players)</font>
Hero checks, <font color="#CC3333">BB bets</font>, UTG calls, MP1 calls, MP2 calls, MP3 calls, CO folds, Hero ?

I have TP, great. It's not impossible that someone has me outkicked (4.5 outs for me) and that someone has a straight (1.5 outs) or several might be on straight draws (bad reverse implied odds). Even if I have the best hand and nobody has a OESD, many overcards can come (bad reverse implied odds). However, the pot is huge (12 SB) and I close the action.

Without the backdoor draw I think I'd fold, but here?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-28-2006, 11:29 AM
kerowo kerowo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 6,880
Default Re: TP no kicker + BDFD, call flop?

Pretty close but I think it's a peal, should be pretty easy to get away from if the turn isn't a big club or a 3.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-28-2006, 11:30 AM
Str8Fish Str8Fish is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Thesis, jobs, defending, OH MY!
Posts: 2,929
Default Re: TP no kicker + BDFD, call flop?

you call even without the bdfd. Why would you fold top pair?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-28-2006, 11:32 AM
kerowo kerowo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 6,880
Default Re: TP no kicker + BDFD, call flop?

[ QUOTE ]
you call even without the bdfd. Why would you fold top pair?

[/ QUOTE ]

Because there is one kicker you beat on a somewhat coordinated board? Granted not much aggression shown but how often do you think this holds up?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-28-2006, 12:10 PM
bozlax bozlax is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Wookie is right
Posts: 8,848
Default Re: TP no kicker + BDFD, call flop?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
you call even without the bdfd. Why would you fold top pair?

[/ QUOTE ]

Because there is one kicker you beat on a somewhat coordinated board? Granted not much aggression shown but how often do you think this holds up?

[/ QUOTE ]

Somewhere around never. But, you're getting 12:1 to try and improve it...that's almost enough to draw to just the 3s, alone.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-28-2006, 12:15 PM
kerowo kerowo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 6,880
Default Re: TP no kicker + BDFD, call flop?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
you call even without the bdfd. Why would you fold top pair?

[/ QUOTE ]

Because there is one kicker you beat on a somewhat coordinated board? Granted not much aggression shown but how often do you think this holds up?

[/ QUOTE ]

Somewhere around never. But, you're getting 12:1 to try and improve it...that's almost enough to draw to just the 3s, alone.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yea, I agree it's a call. I wouldn't if it was two back to me though.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-28-2006, 12:38 PM
bozlax bozlax is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Wookie is right
Posts: 8,848
Default Re: TP no kicker + BDFD, call flop?

[ QUOTE ]
Yea, I agree it's a call. I wouldn't if it was two back to me though.

[/ QUOTE ]

If it were 2 back to you a) you wouldn't be getting 12:1, b) you wouldn't be closing the action, and c) you'd be sure you didn't have the best hand. That's a clear fold.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-28-2006, 12:34 PM
Dustangel Dustangel is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 69
Default Re: TP no kicker + BDFD, call flop?

BB can bet with any pair, set or straight. After that, everyone will start thinking along the lines of "ooh, 8:1" etc. If the table is loose, all sorts of Axs will call. So I think TP will hold here often enough to warrant a call.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-28-2006, 11:35 AM
Ampelmann Ampelmann is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: lol donkaments
Posts: 1,652
Default Re: TP no kicker + BDFD, call flop?

[ QUOTE ]
you call even without the bdfd. Why would you fold top pair?

[/ QUOTE ]
Because it's not unlikely that I'm behind already, either against a better T or a str8 (or even 97), and there are tons of cards that will kill me if I'm ahead (or that at least would give me a hard time to continue).

Against such a big field a weak TP with no kicker wins almost never. I'm sure it wins less than 8% of the time.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-28-2006, 11:55 AM
Str8Fish Str8Fish is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Thesis, jobs, defending, OH MY!
Posts: 2,929
Default Re: TP no kicker + BDFD, call flop?

I was saying that you were thinking of folding the flop with the fantastic pot odds to two pair or trips on the turn? I wouldn't ever fold in this situation.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.