|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A Blimp? A [censored] Blimp!
Is this a joke? That first site looks very suspect.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A Blimp? A [censored] Blimp!
[ QUOTE ]
Is this a joke? That first site looks very suspect. [/ QUOTE ] The first site was started by the guy who did the 5th of november site. It was the result of a collaboration at the ronpaulforums. The site is not collecting money. So I didn't think it would be considered spam. A PAC would be set up if donations are to be accepted. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A Blimp? A [censored] Blimp!
Let's get a blimp!!
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A Blimp? A [censored] Blimp!
Are you shiting me. Is that donation chart at the bottom true?
I'm so donating $25 |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A Blimp? A [censored] Blimp!
lol, something about that blimp freaks me out. I can't explain it - I'll try to figure out why and post tomorrow.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A Blimp? A [censored] Blimp!
Oh, it's very real. And actually quite cost effective, for the amount that they're going to be able to use it. Pretty neat idea. Won't cost the campaign a thing, why not use it?
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A Blimp? A [censored] Blimp!
I don't know, I really need to sleep, but when I see a blimp I automatically think "rich evil corporation", or "someone is trying to sell me something I don't need, like new god damn tires." Just weird to see a candidate's name on a blimp, really emphasizes the marketing aspect of politics, which isn't something I find very appealing.
^I guess that's why. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A Blimp? A [censored] Blimp!
Other than at sporting events, I can't imagine that a blimp would be particularly effective. The money would be far better spent on commercials.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A Blimp? A [censored] Blimp!
They gotta get this on youtube.
|
|
|