|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Fishier 25NL: Stars or FTP?
Just want to get some other perspectives on this. I've logged about 25k hands at FTP 25NL, and having played around 1k hands on Stars, it seems to be a bit softer. Anyone else notice this, or perhaps the opposite?
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Fishier 25NL: Stars or FTP?
<3 stars
but seriously, table select and any site will be soft |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Fishier 25NL: Stars or FTP?
I'm really bad, I need fishy players to win.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Fishier 25NL: Stars or FTP?
Bodog
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Fishier 25NL: Stars or FTP?
move down and learn how to play poker then
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Fishier 25NL: Stars or FTP?
try the Internet Bet League, i heard its realy soft ther
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Fishier 25NL: Stars or FTP?
At least you can datamine on FT. I am doomswitched on FT imo so stars is better.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Fishier 25NL: Stars or FTP?
I can't get PokerAce Hud to work at Full Tilt and I dunno why.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Fishier 25NL: Stars or FTP?
what about rakeback vs FPP at micros ?
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Fishier 25NL: Stars or FTP?
I think rakeback+datamining make FTP a better choice.
|
|
|