|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
ESPN sets new standard for premature analysis. Talk of undefeated NE
The season is 2 weeks old and ESPN just led off NFL by asking if the Pats can go undefeated. Even for ESPN, this is astonishingly absurd.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ESPN sets new standard for premature analysis. Talk of undefeated
Wow...I guess at least if they are 13-0 or something later on, they can come back and say, "we told you during week 2 that this Patriots team had the potential to go undefeated."
This is retarded to talk about until at least week 10. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ESPN sets new standard for premature analysis. Talk of undefeated
[ QUOTE ]
Wow...I guess at least if they are 13-0 or something later on, they can come back and say, "we told you during week 2 that this Patriots team had the potential to go undefeated."\ This is retarded to talk about until at least week 10. [/ QUOTE ] I think if they soundly win their first 9 games it wouldn't be retarded to talk about. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ESPN sets new standard for premature analysis. Talk of undefeated
what else are they gonna talk about
theyre prob like 15-1 at this point (maybe im way off?) so its something to think about |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ESPN sets new standard for premature analysis. Talk of undefeated
[ QUOTE ]
what else are they gonna talk about theyre prob like 15-1 at this point (maybe im way off?) so its something to think about [/ QUOTE ] do you think they are like 82.5% to win each game? that's roughly what their average game win% would need to be to be 15/1 against |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ESPN sets new standard for premature analysis. Talk of undefeated
I think I watched the same thing. The exact question was: Which is more likely, a 0-16 team or 16-0 team? A fairly legit filler question.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ESPN sets new standard for premature analysis. Talk of undefeated
[ QUOTE ]
I think I watched the same thing. The exact question was: Which is more likely, a 0-16 team or 16-0 team? A fairly legit filler question. [/ QUOTE ] That was the 2nd time they brought it up in the show. The first time started with a reporter asking Belichick if they could go 16-0 to which he obviously said they were only concerned with Buffalo right now. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ESPN sets new standard for premature analysis. Talk of undefeated
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I think I watched the same thing. The exact question was: Which is more likely, a 0-16 team or 16-0 team? A fairly legit filler question. [/ QUOTE ] That was the 2nd time they brought it up in the show. The first time started with a reporter asking Belichick if they could go 16-0 to which he obviously said they were only concerned with Buffalo right now. [/ QUOTE ] He should have just said, "Of course we can go 16-0." Just to see if he can be more hated than he is right now. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ESPN sets new standard for premature analysis. Talk of undefeated
[ QUOTE ]
The first time started with a reporter asking Belichick if they could go 16-0 [/ QUOTE ] and people wonder why Barry Bonds is a dick to the media jesus most sportswriters have a 100stupid to 1legit question ratio |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ESPN sets new standard for premature analysis. Talk of undefeated
[ QUOTE ]
I think I watched the same thing. The exact question was: Which is more likely, a 0-16 team or 16-0 team? A fairly legit filler question. [/ QUOTE ] The Giants and the Pats are working on answering the question. |
|
|