|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
FT200 No pair against a maniac
Full Tilt Poker, $1/$2 NL Hold'em Cash Game, 6 Players
LeggoPoker.com - Hand History Converter BTN: $556.90 Hero (SB): $194.20 BB: $424.05 UTG: $223 MP: $92.30 CO: $33 Pre-Flop: K[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] A[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] dealt to Hero (SB) 3 folds, <font color="red">BTN raises to $4</font>, <font color="red">Hero raises to $16</font>, BB folds, BTN calls $12 Flop: ($34) 4[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 4[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 9[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (2 Players) <font color="red">Hero bets $24</font>, <font color="red">BTN raises to $48</font>, <font color="red">Hero raises to $178.20 and is All-In</font> BTN is 68/41/3.3/44 . |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FT200 No pair against a maniac
Meh I do this too, never ran the math tho so idk
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FT200 No pair against a maniac
I think this is ok. We often have 6 outs if behind, there's likely a bunch of FDs in his range and it could easily be some kind of bluff with whatever. I think we have 25ish equity vs his calling range (assuming his calling range is PP, FD, 4x 9x).
Does 44 stand for wtsd or hands? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FT200 No pair against a maniac
[ QUOTE ]
I think this is ok. We often have 6 outs if behind, there's likely a bunch of FDs in his range and it could easily be some kind of bluff with whatever. I think we have 25ish equity vs his calling range (assuming his calling range is PP, FD, 4x 9x). Does 44 stand for wtsd or hands? [/ QUOTE ] Hands |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FT200 No pair against a maniac
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I think this is ok. We often have 6 outs if behind, there's likely a bunch of FDs in his range and it could easily be some kind of bluff with whatever. I think we have 25ish equity vs his calling range (assuming his calling range is PP, FD, 4x 9x). Does 44 stand for wtsd or hands? [/ QUOTE ] Hands [/ QUOTE ] Ok that makes me a bit less likely to pull this move. In that case I'd like to have some real read that he plays like an idiot. It's probably still ok though. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FT200 No pair against a maniac
It's fine as long as it doesn't tilt you when he calls you with 33 and wins.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FT200 No pair against a maniac
I'm not sure if I like this, except for all out bluffs he is going to be ahead. If he really is a maniac, he isn't folding anything that is ahead of us and calling very little that is behind. Against guys like this I fold, you can always find better spots against them.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FT200 No pair against a maniac
i like it.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FT200 No pair against a maniac
[ QUOTE ]
i like it. [/ QUOTE ] Do you mind giving your reasoning here? I honestly don't see how this could be anything but a spew against a maniac. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FT200 No pair against a maniac
Word of advice: It's generally a good idea to make a hand vs a 68/41 and then bet said hand. A hand would be a pair or greater.
|
|
|