|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
TT vs. WhoooooohKid
I've heard of this WhooooKid character. Lets say his range is 88+,AQ+. What's the best way to play TT?
PokerStars Game #12827871386: Tournament #64644850, $100+$9 Hold'em No Limit - Level VI (100/200) - 2007/10/24 - 21:25:34 (ET) Table '64644850 11' 9-max Seat #9 is the button Seat 1: mgw21 (5362 in chips) Seat 2: eBo226 (8885 in chips) Seat 3: WhooooKidd (4290 in chips) Seat 4: uclabruinz (4570 in chips) Seat 5: PearlJammer (8600 in chips) Seat 6: robert07 (15920 in chips) Seat 7: pooey (2675 in chips) Seat 8: leadman67 (6850 in chips) Seat 9: TheWacoKidd (10818 in chips) mgw21: posts small blind 100 eBo226: posts big blind 200 *** HOLE CARDS *** Dealt to eBo226 [Th Ts] WhooooKidd: raises 300 to 500 uclabruinz: folds PearlJammer: folds robert07: folds pooey: folds leadman67: folds TheWacoKidd: folds mgw21: folds eBo226: ? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: TT vs. WhoooooohKid
call
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: TT vs. WhoooooohKid
[ QUOTE ]
call [/ QUOTE ] Agreed, before you do, type in, "According to Baltostar, I'm risking 500, not 300, by making this call", and you'll probably put him on tilt. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: TT vs. WhoooooohKid
If we're calling for set value, I think it's a -EV play because his stack isn't big enough.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: TT vs. WhoooooohKid
eBo you aren't calling for set value.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: TT vs. WhoooooohKid
You're calling to CRAI a sh*tload of flops. The objective behind calling is that it's extremely likely that he isn't raise/folding from that seat this early. Without antes, I'll give Bakes the credit that he isn't bluffing UTG here. You counter that by cutting the hand in half and only letting him see 3 cards.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: TT vs. WhoooooohKid
[ QUOTE ]
If we're calling for set value, I think it's a -EV play because his stack isn't big enough. [/ QUOTE ] lol? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: TT vs. WhoooooohKid
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] call [/ QUOTE ] Agreed, before you do, type in, "According to Baltostar, I'm risking 500, not 300, by making this call", and you'll probably put him on tilt. [/ QUOTE ] Forced bets don't involve a player decision. So here the only useful implied odds given calc is 4290/300 = 14.5:1. With villain's M and UTG raise I'd figure the implied odds required at about 7.5:1 * 3:2 = 11.25:1 So it's a good call for set value alone. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: TT vs. WhoooooohKid
don't understand why we wanna call. just shove.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: TT vs. WhoooooohKid
baltostar, of the times a ten doesnt hit, when are you folding?
|
|
|