|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
25(/50)NL site?
Ok, so I'm a limit player switching to NL6max and I need a site... I'm starting at 25NL (doable for a 2/4 6max player right?) but hopefully I'll be at 50NL kinda fast (I plan on playing alot ;p)
I'm European, can play everywhere. - I want good game selection (enough games, easy to beat ldo) - Multitable support: PT/PAHUD, resizable tables, good software - How important are bonus/rb? Note that I plan on becoming a NL player with a good/very good winrate. (Obv shorthanded limit is pretty sweet for bonuswhoring/rb so if I'm a bad NL player I'll just return to limit). So, given a good winrate, how important is bonus/rb. Is it much more $$$ then a bigger site (with the game selection/better software, more tables/vip program)? *For RB/bonus <=> other factors plz consider NL50 as I imagine it will be very small amounts at nl25 anyway. Thx for your input |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 25(/50)NL site?
Stars with the FPPs aren't bad. I strongly suggest you try the 9 handed first as the switch from limit to NL plus the lartger variance could be big trouble.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 25(/50)NL site?
[ QUOTE ]
Stars with the FPPs aren't bad. I strongly suggest you try the 9 handed first as the switch from limit to NL plus the lartger variance could be big trouble. [/ QUOTE ] #1 For a European player Stars would probably the single worst site to start NL25 at. No real rakeback & one of the toughest sites (not that any NL25 games are tough, but still, zero reason to play there). #2 6max limit has more variance than 6max NL. He could start 9 handed if he really wanted to, but since he plays 6max limit now it's probably not necessary. Also the 9 handed games kinda dry up as you move up, so better to learn 6max early imo. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 25(/50)NL site?
Thx for your input tagtastic, any more opinions? Im pretty sure Prima changed their rakeback to 30% max though.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 25(/50)NL site?
party?
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 25(/50)NL site?
I would skip $25 and just go to $50. If you're rolled for 2/4 then you're well rolled for $50. $25 is just dumb. You start running into some aggression and half decent players at $50, but its still very easy to beat. It'll give you a much better taste for NL than $25 will.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 25(/50)NL site?
stars is your worst choice below NL 100.
tagtastic is pretty much spot on. ipoker, bodog, prima (i think there are some sites offering 30% rb and some vip stuff which equals to 50% rb legally). obviously you should sign up at all sites with rakeback and look for bonuses. than you can decide where to play. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 25(/50)NL site?
Apparently PAHUD doens't support ipoker so that's a bummer [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 25(/50)NL site?
[ QUOTE ]
Thx for your input tagtastic, any more opinions? Im pretty sure Prima changed their rakeback to 30% max though. [/ QUOTE ] Find a battlefield RB topic from the rakeback forums and you will get some nice offers. No-one has mentioned Ongame, but that would be an option as wel. The competition is really soft and you can get something back too (find towergaming from rakeback forums)+ you can buy yourself bonuses to clear with player points. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 25(/50)NL site?
[ QUOTE ]
does gametime work with the miniview? [/ QUOTE ] Sorry, no idea...maybe someone else can chime in on that one. [ QUOTE ] No-one has mentioned Ongame, but that would be an option as wel. The competition is really soft and you can get something back too (find towergaming from rakeback forums)+ you can buy yourself bonuses to clear with player points. [/ QUOTE ] QFT |
|
|