|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
3 More Chinese 2-7 Hands Bellagio $100 point
What are the best settings for these hands:
1.- QQK234568AAJT 2.- 3468T [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 345669AQ 3.- 2389K [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 3579JAAK |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 3 More Chinese 2-7 Hands Bellagio $100 point
#1: This looks like an AA/QQ split to me. Playing a straight in back is significantly worse.
-1.11606 2s3c4d5h6s 8cTcJsQcKh QdAdAh 12916 -0.361025 TcJsQcKhAd 2s3c4d5h8c 6sQdAh 12916 -0.00263239 6sTcJsAdAh 2s3c4d5h8c QcQdKh 12916 #2: Yuck. I thought the flush/9 low would be best, but the calculator says that full house/T-low is a bit better. -1.89993 3c4d6c6d9s 3h4h5s6h8h ThQdAc 12831 -1.84545 3c4d6c6d6h 3h4h5s8h9s ThQdAc 12831 -1.34159 4d4h6c6d6h 5s8h9sThQd 3c3hAc 12831 -1.3345 3c3h6c6d6h 5s8h9sThQd 4d4hAc 12831 -1.17645 3h4h6h8hTh 3c4d5s6c9s 6dQdAc 12831 -1.0205 3c3h6c6d6h 4d5s8h9sTh 4hQdAc 12831 -1.01683 4d4h6c6d6h 3c5s8h9sTh 3hQdAc 12831 #3: I would guess 2389K 3579J AAK is as good as it gets. But I'm wrong again. KK99/AA split with the 8-low is substantially better. (I am actually quite surprised to see such a difference between AAJ and AA3 in front.) 0.421929 2d3d8d9dKd 3c5h7s9cJh KsAcAs 12668 0.449084 3c9c9dAcAs 2d3d5h7s8d JhKdKs 12668 0.582097 9c9dJhKdKs 2d3c5h7s8d 3dAcAs 12668 0.717398 3c9c9dKdKs 2d3d5h7s8d JhAcAs 12668 I am actually wondering quite a bit about how well results for two players actually translate to the four-player game. What I could do is deal four-handed games, set the three opponents according to what the two-player calculator says, and then see whether the best play for the fourth player matches his two-handed play. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 3 More Chinese 2-7 Hands Bellagio $100 point
"I am actually wondering quite a bit about how well results for two players actually translate to the four-player game. What I could do is deal four-handed games, set the three opponents according to what the two-player calculator says, and then see whether the best play for the fourth player matches his two-handed play".
I think that's a great idea and the closest to the actual four-player game. |
|
|