|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
EricW Thread Results
Unweighted scores;
BAN: 21 DO NOT BAN: 37 NOW YOU WAIT FOR WEIGHTING. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: EricW Thread Results
u have lost weighting recently so should be interesting
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: EricW Thread Results
oh silly diddums...
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: EricW Thread Results
Basically, the majority didn't want him banned but an extremely loud minority of Dids butt-buddies weighted votes will decide the end result?
Fascinating. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: EricW Thread Results
The problem is that more people who voted no voted no because they think Dids is a bad mod, instead of voting no on the premise that Ericw is a good poster, which he clearly is not.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: EricW Thread Results
awesome another ericw thread
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: EricW Thread Results
[ QUOTE ]
awesome another ericw thread [/ QUOTE ]My God you're a great poster |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: EricW Thread Results
where's my vote for banning blutarski?
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: EricW Thread Results
[ QUOTE ]
where's our votes for banning blutarski? [/ QUOTE ] |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: EricW Thread Results
[ QUOTE ]
The problem is that more people who voted no voted no because they think Dids is a bad mod, instead of voting no on the premise that Ericw is a good poster, which he clearly is not. [/ QUOTE ] exactly, it turned into a referendum on dids' modding |
|
|