|
View Poll Results: Would you rather: | |||
Play in a serious game of dodgeball once every two months for the next 15 years. | 30 | 56.60% | |
Not. | 23 | 43.40% | |
Voters: 53. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Electron microscope analysis of steel spheres from WTC site
Any science-buffs care to comment on this?
[ QUOTE ] Jones detailed his lab experiments in which he attempted to replicate NIST's conclusion that the lava like orange material flowing out of the south tower is aluminum from Flight 175, the plane that hit the building. Jones clearly documents the fact that liquid aluminum is silver and not orange as is seen in the video of the south tower, therefore the material cannot be aluminum. Jones then explains that the material is in fact a compound that can cut through steel like a hot knife through butter, thermite with sulphur added to make thermate. The crux of the fresh evidence revolves around newly uncovered globules or spheres that were discovered at the WTC site that Professor Jones was able to obtain and run a electron microscope analysis on. The spheres contained iron and aluminum, which would be expected in any steel sample, but also sulphur which is a by-product of a thermate reaction. Video: http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...08807350233932 http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles...demolition.htm [/ QUOTE ] The important bit is at 48 minutes. If you don't want to talk science, take your cynicism elsewhere. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Electron microscope analysis of steel spheres from WTC site
I'll be interested to see where this goes, but am not qualified to give an intelligent commentary on the evidence per se. My confession: I take the fact that the majority of scientists see no problem with what happened as evidence that what happened is physically possible. I don't believe we live in a country of 10's of thousands of metalurgists, all of whom actually KNOW that "fire can't melt steel", but only 2 of whom are willing to mention that publicly. I don't believe we live in a country where the leaders are devious enough to construct such an elaborate plot, actually fly jets in to buildings, but the plot is so stupid that they need to add thermite. I don't believe we live in a country where 100's of people would give testimony that supports some secret government lie. I guess what I'm saying is: any notion of conspiracy is so grotesquely absurd, so arrantly false, and so pathetic, that you are going to need a lot more than something like this to even get anyone half-way intelligent to give this a second thought. It shocks me the abilities that some people ascribe to our leaders.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Electron microscope analysis of steel spheres from WTC site
Nielso,
What % confidence do you have that the towers were brought down with explosives and not by the airplanes? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Electron microscope analysis of steel spheres from WTC site
[ QUOTE ]
Nielso, What % confidence do you have that the towers were brought down with explosives and not by the airplanes? [/ QUOTE ] ATM there is no such sequential mechanism theory that 'airplanes brought down the towers'; so it's pretty hard to get behind non-existent scientific theories. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Electron microscope analysis of steel spheres from WTC site
Nielso,
you think it's like 100% that it wasn't airplanes? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Electron microscope analysis of steel spheres from WTC site
[ QUOTE ]
Nielso, you think it's like 100% that it wasn't airplanes? [/ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] ATM there is no such sequential mechanism theory that 'airplanes brought down the towers'; so it's pretty hard to get behind non-existent scientific theories. [/ QUOTE ] |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Electron microscope analysis of steel spheres from WTC site
So when the Discovery Channel (America's Scientific Channel of Record) said the impact from the jets knocked off the fire retardant and the av-gas heated the steel enough for it to sag and pull away from the exterior walls trasfering the load they had been carrying to the structure below resulting in the buildings pancaking you say what?
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Electron microscope analysis of steel spheres from WTC site
[ QUOTE ]
Nielso, you think it's like 100% that it wasn't airplanes? [/ QUOTE ] MS Paint of WTC being attacked by giant bears would KILL here. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Electron microscope analysis of steel spheres from WTC site
at this site, http://www.debunking911.com/freefall.htm, why don't they debunk the theories against the pentagon?
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Electron microscope analysis of steel spheres from WTC site
[ QUOTE ]
Jones clearly documents the fact that liquid aluminum is silver and not orange as is seen in the video of the south tower, therefore the material cannot be aluminum [/ QUOTE ] I don't understand the other evidence, but this is just silly. Any number of pigments or lighting conditions can cause that color, and to claim "therefore the material cannot be aliminium" means the guy is probably an idiot. |
|
|