|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
SSHE or Winning Low Limit (Lee Jones)?
Which is better to read first and why? Or is one or the other not even worth a read? After reading these should I be able to beat .02/.04 at PS...in your expert opinion?
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: SSHE or Winning Low Limit (Lee Jones)?
Lee first is always my suggestion. Much cleaner and simpler. Ed Miller's getting started in holdem is numero 2 and then SSHE.
All three are out of date, the game is much different and will continue to change, but if you understand the key concepts presented in these books, namely play well preflop, bet for value, count outs before calling and don't bluff, you should do well. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: SSHE or Winning Low Limit (Lee Jones)?
[ QUOTE ]
Lee first is always my suggestion. Much cleaner and simpler. Ed Miller's getting started in holdem is numero 2 and then SSHE. All three are out of date, the game is much different and will continue to change, but if you understand the key concepts presented in these books, namely play well preflop, bet for value, count outs before calling and don't bluff, you should do well. [/ QUOTE ] QFT |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: SSHE or Winning Low Limit (Lee Jones)?
[ QUOTE ]
Which is better to read first and why? Or is one or the other not even worth a read? After reading these should I be able to beat .02/.04 at PS...in your expert opinion? [/ QUOTE ] WLLH is a good book if you are clueless about hold'em. If you're worried about beating .02/.04, then you should read WLLH. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: SSHE or Winning Low Limit (Lee Jones)?
[ QUOTE ]
Which is better to read first and why? Or is one or the other not even worth a read? After reading these should I be able to beat .02/.04 at PS...in your expert opinion? [/ QUOTE ] Read Lee Jones, play 1000 hands, read Lee again, play 1000 hands, read SSHE, play 1000 hands, read SSHE, play 1000, hands, read Lee Jones, play 1000 hands, read SSHE, play 1000 hands, read Lee Jones...get the picture? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: SSHE or Winning Low Limit (Lee Jones)?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Which is better to read first and why? Or is one or the other not even worth a read? After reading these should I be able to beat .02/.04 at PS...in your expert opinion? [/ QUOTE ] Read Lee Jones, play 1000 hands, read Lee again, play 1000 hands, read SSHE, play 1000 hands, read SSHE, play 1000, hands, read Lee Jones, play 1000 hands, read SSHE, play 1000 hands, read Lee Jones...get the picture? [/ QUOTE ] This was a great response. Somewhere in there someone better put on another pot of coffee. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: SSHE or Winning Low Limit (Lee Jones)?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Which is better to read first and why? Or is one or the other not even worth a read? After reading these should I be able to beat .02/.04 at PS...in your expert opinion? [/ QUOTE ] Read Lee Jones, play 1000 hands, read Lee again, play 1000 hands, read SSHE, play 1000 hands, read SSHE, play 1000, hands, read Lee Jones, play 1000 hands, read SSHE, play 1000 hands, read Lee Jones...get the picture? [/ QUOTE ] This was a great response. Somewhere in there someone better put on another pot of coffee. [/ QUOTE ] LOL, ya long grinding nights. Play Friday nights fersure. Lee Jones will stop the spewing quickly, SSHE will take you on the attack, "you must attack"...then you WILL win! Good luck, keep us posted, we're with ya! |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: SSHE or Winning Low Limit (Lee Jones)?
IMO it's GSIH, then get your feet wet, then SSH and reading this forum. GSIH is good for a beginner's book, WLLH is a bad book that people try to excuse by calling it a beginner's book.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: SSHE or Winning Low Limit (Lee Jones)?
wLLH is a fine bread and butter book...just make sure you learn that cake tastes better but also may add a few kilos.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: SSHE or Winning Low Limit (Lee Jones)?
[ QUOTE ]
IMO it's GSIH, then get your feet wet, then SSH and reading this forum. GSIH is good for a beginner's book, WLLH is a bad book that people try to excuse by calling it a beginner's book. [/ QUOTE ] What's GSIH? I think I should know this... |
|
|