![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
during the "good hours" 8 out of 9 players are nitty regulars. and its hard not to sit at a table with one of the "bots" from that one thread 0drunkenboxer, mariojr....
anyways am i just suppose to make money by taking advantage of nits all day or what? that cant possibly lead to that large of a WR. basically some 200nl full tilt strategy as far as game selection and what to expect even though ive been playing there. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You are correct that the Full Tilt Full Ring NL200 game is full of regs.
According to my database of only about 700k hands, the average stats are 25/7. The biggest winners are in the 14-15/5-8 range. There are also LOTS of set minners in this game, but are pretty easy to spot. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
You are correct that the Full Tilt Full Ring NL200 game is full of regs. According to my database of only about 700k hands, the average stats are 25/7. The biggest winners are in the 14-15/5-8 range. There are also LOTS of set minners in this game, but are pretty easy to spot. [/ QUOTE ] Is Stars different than FTP? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] You are correct that the Full Tilt Full Ring NL200 game is full of regs. According to my database of only about 700k hands, the average stats are 25/7. The biggest winners are in the 14-15/5-8 range. There are also LOTS of set minners in this game, but are pretty easy to spot. [/ QUOTE ] Is Stars different than FTP? [/ QUOTE ] I should have also stressed that one of the reasons why players with those stats were the biggest winners is because they are the ones that I have the most hands on as well. As for your question, I haven't really played that much NL200 at Stars to compare, others may be better to respond. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
so what is a realistic winrate from a good player multitabling vs a bunch of nitty regs?
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If you can adjust correctly and play good, I don't see 3ptBB/100 being a problem.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
that cant possibly lead to that large of a WR. [/ QUOTE ] It can. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
what do you expect from the best US allowed rakeback site?
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] that cant possibly lead to that large of a WR. [/ QUOTE ] It can. [/ QUOTE ] Depends on your definition of "large WR" |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] that cant possibly lead to that large of a WR. [/ QUOTE ] It can. [/ QUOTE ] Depends on your definition of "large WR" [/ QUOTE ] FWIW, I am a reg at NL200 on Full Tilt, and am running at 4.7 BB/100 over 40,000+ hands, playing 18/8. I also play from about 9 am - 4 pm ET, which is probably not the time the OP is referring to, but there seems to be enough fish at these times as well as regular's with holes in their game to exploit. I would agree thought that 1/2 is a lot more nitty than .50/1 on FT. |
![]() |
|
|