|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Who would Republican strategists choose for Deomocratic nominee?
If Hannity, Rush, Roger Alies, Kissinger, Cheney and co got into a room with Diebold and was allowed to choose the Democratic nominee, who would they come up with from the big three (Hilary, Obama, Edwards)? Or do you think they'd rather have another John Kerry-type go from 5 percent to 55 percent during the first few weeks of primaries?
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Who would Republican strategists choose for Deomocratic nominee?
While I think most GOP strategists would think Edwards is the most beatable, Obama would be my choice. He's the least experienced and thus the most likely to make a campaign faux pas (maybe he already did with his lapel-pin comment).
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Who would Republican strategists choose for Deomocratic nominee?
[ QUOTE ]
While I think most GOP strategists would think Edwards is the most beatable, Obama would be my choice. He's the least experienced and thus the most likely to make a campaign faux pas (maybe he already did with his lapel-pin comment). [/ QUOTE ] Faux pas? Then why are almost all of the Republicans also not wearing the lapels now as well? I suppose they are committing the same faux pas? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Who would Republican strategists choose for Deomocratic nominee?
Oh my god, I've regressed to High School, where people care about fashion statements like lapel pins. Perhaps the problem is also that he doesn't use enough mousse or toner for the American public.
Obama's inexperience may be the one thing that helps him get elected. He isn't as swayed by the public opinion polls as is Clinton, so he can do 'shocking' things like *gasp* not wearing a lapel pin. Or maybe it's part of his strategy to undo the erratic right wing media. Show how little they care about real issues until people start watching something else.. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Who would Republican strategists choose for Deomocratic nominee?
[ QUOTE ]
If Hannity, Rush, Roger Alies, Kissinger, Cheney and co got into a room with Diebold and was allowed to choose the Democratic nominee, who would they come up with from the big three (Hilary, Obama, Edwards)? Or do you think they'd rather have another John Kerry-type go from 5 percent to 55 percent during the first few weeks of primaries? [/ QUOTE ] Of the big three I'd guess Hillary would be the choice. Obama comes across as too likeable, level-headed, and difficult to attack (though he certainly loses the "racist vote" by default) and I'm guessing Edwards would get the most instant credibility in the south (vs. a Republican). Hillary has by far the most name recognition, but is immensely polarizing and pre-hated by a huge number of potential voters -- by far the easiest of the three to attack and paint as a lunatic (the "cackle" being a recent example). Of the other candidates, I don't know -- but I agree that Kerry was one of the strategically worst candidates for the Democrats in '04. In fact, I've begun to wonder why the Democrats seem so good at picking the most unlikable candidates possible, recently. Maybe the republicans secretly are choosing the democratic candidates! |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Who would Republican strategists choose for Deomocratic nominee?
as a republican who is probably just slightly above average on political knowledge, i'd pick hillary. so many people dislike her. my mom is a lifelong democrat thats said she won't vote for her. my 2c.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Who would Republican strategists choose for Deomocratic nominee?
Probably Edwards...He can come across as slimey. Hillary has WAY too much name recognition to want her and Obama is very charismatic, well-spoken, and (seemingly) level-headed.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Who would Republican strategists choose for Deomocratic nominee?
Honestly, I think I know who is the the person they'd LEAST want to run, and that is Joe Biden. He has the balls to stand up to Republicans and attack them with the same ferocity that they attack him with (unlike John Kerry, who until the day I die don't know why he didn't smear George Bush for avoiding the Vietnam War after those Swift Boat ads.) I know this isn't the question, but between the top 3 I really think it is a toss-up; many hate Hillary, alot of people won't vote for Obama no matter what because he is black (half), and John Edwards is (in their opinion) too much of a "bleeding heart" and a sissy incapable of running this country "post 9-11". Therefore I really don't think they care who wins out of the the top 3, they are more concerned with getting a candidate who can win themselves (which is why they pushed for Fred Thompson.)
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Who would Republican strategists choose for Deomocratic nominee?
[ QUOTE ]
Honestly, I think I know who is the the person they'd LEAST want to run, and that is Joe Biden. [/ QUOTE ] I think you're probably right. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Who would Republican strategists choose for Deomocratic nominee?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Honestly, I think I know who is the the person they'd LEAST want to run, and that is Joe Biden. [/ QUOTE ] I think you're probably right. [/ QUOTE ] I heard he is a racist though. |
|
|