![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
for those of you who are familiar with the collection pot theory (talking players into the idea that the first pot over x dollars pays everyones collection for the hour and/or half hour)...
I need your help on an argument I'm having with a friend. He feels that if you're playing short in a NL game (with no max) that has a collection pot... you should be open folding hands like KK or QQ under the gun during that collection pot. His argument was that with an effective $150 rake... if you're playing relatively short ($600-$700, like some people do at commerce)... you're negative EV to play the hand... I obviously disagree... thoughts? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
this thread sucks
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
this thread sucks [/ QUOTE ] good thought |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I agree... ironically...
he did make a pretty good mathematical argument for open pushing or folding. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
folding KK/QQ preflop is pretty obviously -EV in those spots. Though i'd argue that so is playing shortstacked in a soft live game at the commerce if there are deep fish.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
folding KK/QQ preflop is pretty obviously -EV in those spots. Though i'd argue that so is playing shortstacked in a soft live game at the commerce if there are deep fish. [/ QUOTE ] prob still +EV if u have any clue but less yet |
![]() |
|
|