![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Just aired (7pm EST show). Pretty good show as a whole, they do features/interviews on issues/topics around sports.
< 10 minute segment dealing with Dr Bob. He was interviewed from his home and pretty much told what he does (no specifics of course) and talked to Vegas linesmakers and how they've taken steps to combat him. Claims since he developed his progressions 3 years ago running at 64% on CFB picks. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The video of the Dr. Bob story is available here:
http://sports.espn.go.com/broadband/vide...47&n8pe6c=1 this link is wrong, the correct one is on the next post |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sorry, that's the wrong link, the actual piece is here:
http://sports.espn.go.com/broadband/vide...47&n8pe6c=3 The previous link is the "pitch meeting" for the Dr. Bob story. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
his record is a lie...I believe Najdorf has an accurate record
64% is a laughable claim from what's been verified here I ripped this piece apart in sporting events |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Haven't seen the piece yet but I assume this is a nice advertisment for his services.
Should make up for some of the lost customers from his recent horrible record. Keep reelin' 'em in Dr. Bob!!! And thanks for some of those awesome line-moves!! |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
his record is a lie...I believe Najdorf has an accurate record 64% is a laughable claim from what's been verified here I ripped this piece apart in sporting events [/ QUOTE ] I posted the WSJ's record which started in 1999. I assume the reporter started there because that's when his audited numbers started. [just like a hedge fund] any results unaudited are useless, of course. We've been trying to track each week's picks since then. He's dropped from 57% to ~53.5% last 5 years depending on how he did in a given week. 57% is obvs awesome. 64% is not reality. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
53.5% is still $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
just odd that ESPN put the 64% out there when Nichols talked about 52% is winning just poor |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
53.5% is still $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ just odd that ESPN put the 64% out there when Nichols talked about 52% is winning just poor [/ QUOTE ] Yeah, but 53% when you've lost $$$$ 3 of last 5 years looks like variance-- doesn't it?? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Imagine if he'd been betting fully kelly, swongs would've decimated him!!!
ZOMG! |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The Moneymaker reruns in year one did more for mid week TV ratings than anything in the history of sports TV. We (the poker playing community) reaped major benefits but what gets overlooked is that ESPN was the real winner.
IMO adding a CFB game every other night has helped fill the void as the TV poker craze fizzles but how much Southern Miss can the average sports fan really take. Who would be surprised if ESPN used this Dr. Bob story just to prop up the midweek ratings. Let’s face it the average sports betting noob is near busted by week 7 and could care less about watching mediocre football unless they can beat the spread. GS |
![]() |
|
|