|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Set over set one hand - Bluff shove a few hands later
Have only been at the table for a few orbits, but this hand happened almost immediately. Villain is 19/16/3.4 and seems solid.
Full Tilt Poker No Limit Holdem Ring game Blinds: $2/$4 6 players Converter Stack sizes: UTG: $400 UTG+1: $570.60 CO: $411.70 PBJaxx: $400 SB: $689.80 BB: $370.20 Pre-flop: (6 players) PBJaxx is Button with 8[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 8[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 2 folds, <font color="#cc0000">CO raises to $16</font>, PBJaxx calls, 2 folds. Flop: A[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] 8[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 5[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] ($38, 2 players) <font color="#cc0000">CO bets $28</font>, PBJaxx calls. Turn: 7[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] ($94, 2 players) <font color="#cc0000">CO bets $68</font>, <font color="#cc0000">PBJaxx raises all-in $356</font>, CO calls. River: 2[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] ($806, 1 player + 1 all-in - Main pot: $806) Results: Final pot: $806 A few hands later this goes down. I try and take the same line to rep another set. He may not have much either as the limper is a complete drooler at 63/18. Sometimes I 3bet pf both of these hands, but I decided to call here. Full Tilt Poker No Limit Holdem Ring game Blinds: $2/$4 6 players Converter Stack sizes: UTG: $599.30 UTG+1: $808.70 PBJaxx: $404 Button: $679.80 SB: $344.20 BB: $400 Pre-flop: (6 players) PBJaxx is CO with 8[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 9[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] UTG calls, <font color="#cc0000">UTG+1 raises to $20</font>, PBJaxx calls, 3 folds, UTG calls. Flop: 4[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] A[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 2[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] ($66, 3 players) UTG checks, <font color="#cc0000">UTG+1 bets $54</font>, PBJaxx calls, UTG folds. Turn: 9[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] ($174, 2 players) <font color="#cc0000">UTG+1 bets $108, PBJaxx raises all-in $330 </font> How's my line? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Set over set one hand - Bluff shove a few hands later
I don't know if you're deep enough to fold an ace here. I don't think he's betting KK-QQ on two streets so what better hand are you really folding?
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Set over set one hand - Bluff shove a few hands later
[ QUOTE ]
I don't know if you're deep enough to fold an ace here. I don't think he's betting KK-QQ on two streets so what better hand are you really folding? [/ QUOTE ] Pretty much just an ace. That is my real question with the hand, is this deep enough? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Set over set one hand - Bluff shove a few hands later
I think a 2-barrel bluff is definitely a small portion of his range too, btw.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Set over set one hand - Bluff shove a few hands later
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I don't know if you're deep enough to fold an ace here. I don't think he's betting KK-QQ on two streets so what better hand are you really folding? [/ QUOTE ] Pretty much just an ace. That is my real question with the hand, is this deep enough? [/ QUOTE ] Well, he's getting 2.5:1ish, I don't think he folds an ace to that. I prefer calling, he'll probably check all rivers with stuff we beat, and we can stack an ace with ease if the fd comes in thanks to commitment. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Set over set one hand - Bluff shove a few hands later
I think he's calling
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Set over set one hand - Bluff shove a few hands later
Okay. Thanks for the responses. He did fold, but he probably didn't have an ace then. I thought that with history, he could find a fold with an ace. Apparently, the stack sizes weren't deep enough for this to work most of the time.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Set over set one hand - Bluff shove a few hands later
[ QUOTE ]
I don't know if you're deep enough to fold an ace here. I don't think he's betting KK-QQ on two streets so what better hand are you really folding? [/ QUOTE ] .. an ace this hand isnt bad |
|
|