|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
$114 hand vs. Ryanghall
PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em Tourney, Big Blind is t30 (9 handed) converter
SB (t1715) BB (t1905) UTG (t285) UTG+1 (t1470) Hero (t1470) MP2 (t1485) MP3 (t1735) CO (t1455) Button (t1980) Preflop: Hero is MP1 with J[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], J[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]. <font color="#CC3333">UTG raises to t285</font>, UTG+1 calls t285, <font color="#CC3333">Hero ??? Ryanghall is utg+1 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $114 hand vs. Ryanghall
I FAILED IN READING.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $114 hand vs. Ryanghall
edit: I failed every reading test i ever had. Time to reevaluate!
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $114 hand vs. Ryanghall
You missed stack sizes utg is all in
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $114 hand vs. Ryanghall
After thinking more about it, in UTG+1, his range to call this is probably TT+, AK at the loosest. Against that range, you're JJ is only 43% to win. If you remove AK from that list (since he would probably just push with it) you're only 35%.
So fold. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $114 hand vs. Ryanghall
Why wouldn't he reraise KK, QQ and probably AA?
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $114 hand vs. Ryanghall
[ QUOTE ]
Why wouldn't he reraise KK, QQ and probably AA? [/ QUOTE ] For the same reason he wouldn't re-raise 99/TT/JJ/AQ/AK. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $114 hand vs. Ryanghall
[ QUOTE ]
You missed stack sizes utg is all in [/ QUOTE ] OOPS shove |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $114 hand vs. Ryanghall
I fold and it's not even close. I put him on AA or maybe KK. The raise is so big relative to the blinds that if people call behind him they are making a very big mistake. Thus by flat calling he gains the possiblity of reraises behind him, without the risk of allowing people in too cheaply.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $114 hand vs. Ryanghall
Fold and I don't think its close
|
|
|