Why do you choose to play on Full Tilt?

FullyTilted · #1 07-25-2007, 11:02 PM

FT has crashed . . . again.

Given the regularity of events like these (and the ongoing FT support issues), I honestly don't see why any reasonably high-volume player plays on FT, rakeback or not.

Seriously, are the games that much harder on PokerStars that it's worth putting up with this?

Bellagibro · #2 07-25-2007, 11:03 PM

RB

ChicagoPoker · #3 07-25-2007, 11:04 PM

RB...softer tourneys IMO...

ryang · #4 07-25-2007, 11:05 PM

I never signed up for rake back, is it possible to delete the current account and open a new one, and get RB?

sirpupnyc · #5 07-25-2007, 11:51 PM

[ QUOTE ]
I never signed up for rake back, is it possible to delete the current account and open a new one, and get RB?

[/ QUOTE ]
No.

Bagonirix · #6 07-25-2007, 11:07 PM

tourneys, that's it. If Stars tourneys werent rigged against me I would stay there

Bellagibro · #7 07-25-2007, 11:08 PM

Also datamining which allows better game selection IMHO

JayA · #8 07-26-2007, 12:03 AM

[ QUOTE ]
tourneys, that's it. If Stars tourneys werent rigged against me I would stay there

[/ QUOTE ]

Also, the look of Stars software tilts me. I just want to be at the bottom of every table, that is all.

Bishop22 · #9 07-26-2007, 12:05 AM

[ QUOTE ]

Also, the look of Stars software tilts me. I just want to be at the bottom of every table, that is all.

[/ QUOTE ]

That option was added like 10 updates ago at Stars.

FullyTilted · #10 07-25-2007, 11:07 PM

[ QUOTE ]
RB

[/ QUOTE ]

For lower volumes of play, yes, but rakeback is not a compelling reason if you can get to Platinum or (certainly) Supernova on PokerStars.