What's a sustainable winrate (NLCASH)

acidca · #1 04-12-2007, 02:36 PM

For NL HU Cash tables? I feel as if 20ptbb/100+ is sustainable overall. I think much higher than that could be sustainable w/good table selection.

iceman5 · #2 04-12-2007, 02:46 PM

I doubt it

cwar · #3 04-12-2007, 04:16 PM

[ QUOTE ]
For NL HU Cash tables? I feel as if 20ptbb/100+ is sustainable overall. I think much higher than that could be sustainable w/good table selection.

[/ QUOTE ]
If you one table and are super selective this is probably the upper bound, but beyond a sense of accomplishment I dont see this being really feasible because if HU cash is your regular game you should be able to handle two tables and not have to table select hardcore like you would if you want to get this winrate. Also if you play deepstacked (200+) 20bb/100 is much more reasonable.

IronFly · #4 04-12-2007, 04:59 PM

are there regular deepstack buyin HU cash tables somewhere?

Also, 20ptbb/100 sounds SICK.

whaahhahahah · #5 04-12-2007, 07:43 PM

i have at least 10,000 hands on about 20 people at 2/4. no one is anywhere close to 20 bb/100

johnnyrocket · #6 04-12-2007, 09:57 PM

sounds high, i have no idea on it tho

acidca · #7 04-12-2007, 10:58 PM

[ QUOTE ]

i have at least 10,000 hands on about 20 people at 2/4. no one is anywhere close to 20 bb/100

[/ QUOTE ]

So what are the stronger winrates in your DB?

Edit: I think winrates at .5/1 can be much higher than those at 2/4.

omgwtfnoway · #8 04-12-2007, 11:17 PM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

i have at least 10,000 hands on about 20 people at 2/4. no one is anywhere close to 20 bb/100

[/ QUOTE ]

So what are the stronger winrates in your DB?

Edit: I think winrates at .5/1 can be much higher than those at 2/4.

[/ QUOTE ]
no, the rake is disproportionately higher at .5/1 than it is at 2/4

pokeriseasy · #9 04-13-2007, 03:12 AM

Not a chance 20ptpbb/100 is sustainable. I was running sick hot heads up at 1/2 over about 8k hands and was only 15ptpbb/100. If you're sustaining a winrate of 8ptbb/100 I'd say you're in the upper 1% of the players at .50/1.

Majik · #10 04-13-2007, 10:53 AM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

i have at least 10,000 hands on about 20 people at 2/4. no one is anywhere close to 20 bb/100

[/ QUOTE ]

So what are the stronger winrates in your DB?

Edit: I think winrates at .5/1 can be much higher than those at 2/4.

[/ QUOTE ]
no, the rake is disproportionately higher at .5/1 than it is at 2/4

[/ QUOTE ]

And you think that makes up for the diff in skill level?

Cmon, you pay like $60/1000 hands at $0.5/$1 NLHU. You pay what, $90/1000 hands in nl100 6m games? The rake isn't that freakin huge. I'm of course speaking about FTs rake table.