|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Louisville v Rutgers Official Thread $$$$$
let us gogogo
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Louisville v Rutgers Official Thread $$$$$
Leaning LV in this game. Thoughts?
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Louisville v Rutgers Official Thread $$$$$
Under all day. The spread is kinda gross but I'd lean Rutgers because I expect them to run on LV with a passion.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Louisville v Rutgers Official Thread $$$$$
Rutgers ML here. Louisville won't have the ball long enough to put up enough points.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Louisville v Rutgers Official Thread $$$$$
[ QUOTE ]
Leaning LV in this game. Thoughts? [/ QUOTE ] I lean towards Rutgers +3 reduced. I have a position on LV -2.5 reduced from earlier in the week, so will probably be looking to unload on a good Rutgers number later tonight. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Louisville v Rutgers Official Thread $$$$$
[ QUOTE ]
I have a position on LV -2.5 reduced from earlier in the week, so will probably be ridin dirtay and raking in the dough. [/ QUOTE ] |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Louisville v Rutgers Official Thread $$$$$
It's rather unfortunate though because I was hoping public would move this to a good Rutgers number. IT doesn't seem that's the case because any time 3 becomes WA it gets whacked by the sharps.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Louisville v Rutgers Official Thread $$$$$
FWIW I think Rutgers is the definite right side, I don't have much on 2.5 and had other reasons for taking it, I'm taking out a 3 right now because it looks like it might not become WA enough to get reduced.
Rutgers +125 or better is good IMO |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Louisville v Rutgers Official Thread $$$$$
[ QUOTE ]
Leaning LV in this game. Thoughts? [/ QUOTE ] Wow, like 11 posters in a row were on RU in this game/half. That's some sort of record I'd say, and with typical results. Seriously, has there been another game where 11 [much less most of them regs] all agreed on a game/side? Right or wrong? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Louisville v Rutgers Official Thread $$$$$
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Leaning LV in this game. Thoughts? [/ QUOTE ] Wow, like 11 posters in a row were on RU in this game/half. That's some sort of record I'd say, and with typical results. Seriously, has there been another game where 11 [much less most of them regs] all agreed on a game/side? Right or wrong? [/ QUOTE ] myself, i love consensi like this. i'm ever at a loss when people express surprise that lot's of folks together really AREN'T more intelligent than any single one of them. i have a means to measure the i.q of any group: (smallest i.q. in the group)/(number of individuals in the group) = groupal i.q. out of a spirit of goodwill, i will not apply that formula to this particular bunch... -c |
|
|