|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Players with a higher HoF probability than Nash
Antoine Walker
Stephon Marbury Steve Francis somewhere, tuq is slitting one of both of his wrists http://www.basketball-reference.com/.../hof_prob.html |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Players with a higher HoF probability than Nash
wow Vince Carter > John Stockton was pretty shocking
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Players with a higher HoF probability than Nash
Reggie Miller at 4%?
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Players with a higher HoF probability than Nash
139 Steve Nash .1168
149 Latrell Sprewell .0920 |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Players with a higher HoF probability than Nash
[ QUOTE ]
Reggie Miller at 4%? [/ QUOTE ] [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img] i was 31 playing basketball through my entire youth cause of him |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Players with a higher HoF probability than Nash
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Reggie Miller at 4%? [/ QUOTE ] [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img] i was 31 playing basketball through my entire youth cause of him [/ QUOTE ] During the playoffs which preceded the Pacers making the Finals, I remember hearing the media say that Reggie wasn't a HOFer. When the Pacers won the East Finals, I heard Cheryl say something like, "Now do you still think he's not a HOFer?", since Reggie not being able to carry his team to the Finals was a knock against him. Also, name someone who was a better SG than Miller (outside MJ) in the 90s. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Players with a higher HoF probability than Nash
[ QUOTE ]
Reggie Miller at 4%? [/ QUOTE ] This pretty well exposes the entire process as fundamentally flawed. The most obvious thing is that it severely underrates great players who didn't win a ring. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Players with a higher HoF probability than Nash
maybe our own bias for players in our era are clouding our judgments. do you see any players eligible for the HoF who aren't in it, who you think should be? how are those players ranked?
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Players with a higher HoF probability than Nash
[ QUOTE ]
maybe our own bias for players in our era are clouding our judgments. do you see any players eligible for the HoF who aren't in it, who you think should be? how are those players ranked? [/ QUOTE ] Are you serious? You think my judgment is clouded on the fact that Miller is a HOFer? I'd wager everything I own that Reggie is a HOFer, according to this guy I ought to get at least 20-1. Absurd. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Players with a higher HoF probability than Nash
[ QUOTE ]
maybe our own bias for players in our era are clouding our judgments. do you see any players eligible for the HoF who aren't in it, who you think should be? how are those players ranked? [/ QUOTE ] you're saying that you think this is a legitimate instrument? chris webber rated higher than dennis rodman? back-to-back MVPs and less than a 99% chance of getting in? seems like pretty much the only way nash doesn't get in is if he ojs some people. |
|
|