|
|
|
|
#1
03-08-2007, 02:18 PM
|
|||
|
|||
UB vs FT
So I've been playing NL$25 UB as my main site for the last few months, in large part due their weekly points-for-cash redemption program (I average $40 a week) and also a bi-monthly rakeback which I get.
Lately, I've heard a few things (which may or may not be true, which is why I'm posting here to ask): one, that UB's players are generally tougher than average thus making it a little harder to play profitably, and two, that Full Tilt has benefited hugely from the recent internet poker fall out in terms of gaining lots of new players (and presumably, fish). Does anyone know if FT has some sort of points-for-cash redemption program like UB? And what are your overall opinions on my FT vs UB debate....putting it simply, which one will be more lucrative for me? Any opinions would be greatly appreciated! 
|
|
#3
03-08-2007, 05:46 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: UB vs FT
[ QUOTE ]
78 views, no opinions? *grunt* [/ QUOTE ] Hmmm...could this be related to the content of your post? These questions are ridiculous and it should be obvious why. Your reasonable question (about points-to-cash) was answered, and I will confirm, no they don't. Seriously, IF there was a difference in competition level, why would anyone post it here? To tell the UB sharks to come over to FTP cuz its so juicy? Get real. Not only that, but IF one site was easier and everyone started posting about it, the best players would move over and then the rolls would be reversed. Sorry to come across as such a dick, but these posts happen 15 times a day in multiple forums around here. Now you pop in and do the same thing and then complain cuz no one is answering.
|
|
#5
03-08-2007, 07:07 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: UB vs FT
I think Full Tilt vs. UB is not even a close fight:
FullTilt: (1)Ivey; very lanky, good reach (2)Fergueson; same as Ivey (3)Gordon; same as Ivey (4)Matusow; crazy (5)there are so many FT pros that it would be very uneven UB: (1)Helmuth; would probably cry like a girl once everything went down (2)Duke; the wildcard in all this. Her ugliness is unparraled and might force team FT to run if she spread her legs. I still give the nod to FT. Good luck.
|
|
#7
03-09-2007, 05:14 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: UB vs FT
[ QUOTE ]
I think Full Tilt vs. UB is not even a close fight: FullTilt: (1)Ivey; very lanky, good reach (2)Fergueson; same as Ivey (3)Gordon; same as Ivey (4)Matusow; crazy (5)there are so many FT pros that it would be very uneven UB: (1)Helmuth; would probably cry like a girl once everything went down (2)Duke; the wildcard in all this. Her ugliness is unparraled and might force team FT to run if she spread her legs. I still give the nod to FT. Good luck. [/ QUOTE ] [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
|
|
#8
03-10-2007, 11:05 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: UB vs FT
[ QUOTE ]
(2)Duke; the wildcard in all this. Her ugliness is unparraled and might force team FT to run if she spread her legs. [/ QUOTE ] Huh? Let em run I would be jumping on that booty [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img] She be calling be Bigflopdaddy Allllllll night long.
|
|
#9
03-10-2007, 10:55 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: UB vs FT
[ QUOTE ]
Fair 'nuff. [/ QUOTE ] You'll do well here with this attitude. Most new posters can't take any criticism without getting into a flame war. PB is right that this question gets asked about 3 times a week on here. If you do decide to try out FT be sure to get rakeback when you sign up. I personally prefer to play at Stars but thats due to there customer service more than anything.
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
