|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Bottom full house on a two pair board
Villain is 30/16/5.5 after about 50 hands
Party Poker - No Limit Hold'em Cash Game - $0.10/$0.25 Blinds - 5 Players - (LegoPoker Hand History Converter) SB: $28.34 Hero (BB): $40.16 UTG: $21.34 CO: $23.20 BTN: $25.09 Preflop: Hero is dealt 6[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 7[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] (5 Players) 2 folds, BTN calls $0.25, SB calls $0.15, Hero checks Flop: ($0.75) T[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] 6[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] T[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] (3 Players) SB checks, <font color="red">Hero bets $0.50</font>, BTN folds, SB calls $0.50 Turn: ($1.75) 6[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (2 Players) SB checks, <font color="red">Hero bets $0.50</font>, <font color="red">SB raises to $1.50</font>, Hero calls $1.00 River: ($4.75) 3[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] (2 Players) <font color="red">SB bets $5.00</font>, Hero? Should I have played it differently on the turn? Should I have called on the river? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Bottom full house on a two pair board
I would pot the flop. Probably just check the turn, inducing a bluff, since his call is either a flush draw or a 6 or T, so betting would let the better hands to gain more value from urs, but would make FDs fold.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Bottom full house on a two pair board
I really wouldn't bother with this flop, I just check.
On turn make a standard bet 1.5 or so. With a T he'll probably go for a c/r on the river, so let him.. When he checks to you on the river check behind. If he bets, call. As played I tihnk I would normally fold considering pot is fairly small and facing a pot-size bet. But against good/tricky villains I can see a call given the weakness you show on the turn, and the fact that he didn't c/r the flop with the FD on board which makes it somewhat less likely he has the T. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Bottom full house on a two pair board
I just check behind on turn & call reasonable river bet.
|
|
|