Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Internet Gambling > Internet Gambling
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-09-2007, 02:51 PM
punkass punkass is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: hip deep in pie
Posts: 4,695
Default Going for Supernova Elite? Progress Thread

Post where you are in your quest to SNE. Post anything else you want...frustrations, suspicions of game being fixed (not too much)...

I've been 7-9 tabling $100 NL. I have about 5k VPP. I will come nowhere close to Elite, but this is by far the most I've play in the short period of time. Also, I'm +$10. Yip-frickin-pee.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-09-2007, 02:55 PM
PokerBob PokerBob is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: moneyhater
Posts: 17,046
Default Re: Going for Supernova Elite? Progress Thread

i have 10K. i'm not even gonna try.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-11-2007, 04:00 AM
Reef Reef is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: PCPforums
Posts: 13,198
Default Re: Going for Supernova Elite? Progress Thread

[ QUOTE ]
i have 10K. i'm not even gonna try.

[/ QUOTE ]
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-11-2007, 10:30 AM
davebreal davebreal is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: betting scare cards
Posts: 1,683
Default Re: Going for Supernova Elite? Progress Thread

24,509 VPPs.. spending the next 2 days only playing B&M though
[img]/images/graemlins/mad.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-09-2007, 03:01 PM
playersare playersare is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Spare parts for 25 years!
Posts: 3,836
Default Re: Going for Supernova Elite? Progress Thread

I only play part time $1/2 and $2/4 LHE full ring and still managed 2k VPP since the new year. in your situation, moving up to higher NL stakes is probably more important than playing extra tables. you can buy in short to reduce your risk, but you need higher average pot sizes generated by other players at $200NL and up to earn VPP faster.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-09-2007, 03:07 PM
punkass punkass is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: hip deep in pie
Posts: 4,695
Default Re: Going for Supernova Elite? Progress Thread

If I played 6 or more hours a day, I might make SN and have thoughts of going for Elite, but I'm no pro. I'll play 6-10 hours a day on the weekends, but at most I put in 3-4 hours after work each day.

I was just wondering where everyone else was at in their quest.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-09-2007, 03:24 PM
playersare playersare is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Spare parts for 25 years!
Posts: 3,836
Default Re: Going for Supernova Elite? Progress Thread

[ QUOTE ]
If I played 6 or more hours a day, I might make SN and have thoughts of going for Elite, but I'm no pro. I'll play 6-10 hours a day on the weekends, but at most I put in 3-4 hours after work each day.

[/ QUOTE ]
I think you missed the entire point of my initial response. you're still talking about putting in more hours and playing a lot of tables, but the more important issue is that $100NL is a sub-optimal level to earn VPP's fast. if you look at the bonuswhores charts (VPP earn and bonus clearing are essentially the same thing), a low limit grinder like me is still gaining points about 20% faster than you will if playing the same amount of hands per hour, and I'm not even trying to get anywhere past gold level this year.

by moving to $200NL you would theoretically increase your VPP from about 32/hr/table to 43.5/hr/table, without having to change your playing style much. that would be almost an extra 100/hr, 2000+/wk, 100k+/yr under your current m.o.

getting to that $20+ pot threshold is very important in Poker Stars NL, because the VPP is all or nothing on either side of that line. you simply don't hit it often enough with a $1 bb.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-09-2007, 04:08 PM
kcheel kcheel is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 806
Default Re: Going for Supernova Elite? Progress Thread

[ QUOTE ]

getting to that $20+ pot threshold is very important in Poker Stars NL, because the VPP is all or nothing on either side of that line. you simply don't hit it often enough with a $1 bb.

[/ QUOTE ]

Pot only has to hit $8 for a VPP at .50/1 and 1/2.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-09-2007, 06:15 PM
MuckinWinners MuckinWinners is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 875
Default Re: Going for Supernova Elite? Progress Thread

kcheel wrote:

[ QUOTE ]
Pot only has to hit $8 for a VPP at .50/1 and $10 for a VPP at 1/2.

[/ QUOTE ]

Check your Poker Tracker and show me a Limit 1/2 hand that has $.40 rake taken from an $8.00 pot. The pot is raked $.25 at $5 and $.50 at $10. Their website is giving mis-information.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-09-2007, 04:13 PM
punkass punkass is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: hip deep in pie
Posts: 4,695
Default Re: Going for Supernova Elite? Progress Thread

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
If I played 6 or more hours a day, I might make SN and have thoughts of going for Elite, but I'm no pro. I'll play 6-10 hours a day on the weekends, but at most I put in 3-4 hours after work each day.

[/ QUOTE ]
I think you missed the entire point of my initial response. you're still talking about putting in more hours and playing a lot of tables, but the more important issue is that $100NL is a sub-optimal level to earn VPP's fast. if you look at the bonuswhores charts (VPP earn and bonus clearing are essentially the same thing), a low limit grinder like me is still gaining points about 20% faster than you will if playing the same amount of hands per hour, and I'm not even trying to get anywhere past gold level this year.

by moving to $200NL you would theoretically increase your VPP from about 32/hr/table to 43.5/hr/table, without having to change your playing style much. that would be almost an extra 100/hr, 2000+/wk, 100k+/yr under your current m.o.

getting to that $20+ pot threshold is very important in Poker Stars NL, because the VPP is all or nothing on either side of that line. you simply don't hit it often enough with a $1 bb.

[/ QUOTE ]

Hmmm, this is interesting. Although, the rake only has to get to .40 to get a VPP, which is a pot of $8. Would it be a good decision to try and play 200NL, for the sake of earning more VPP/FPP?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.