|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
400 NL - LITTLE HELP HERE?
Sup the villain is a nitty reg noob idiot who runs like 13/10/2 or so.
Thoughts on all streets appreciated. Cheers. POKERSTARS GAME #xxxxxxx: HOLD'EM NO LIMIT ($2/$4) - 2007/11/25 - 16:59:03 (ET) Table 'xxxxxxx' 9-max Seat #5 is the button Seat 1: SoxnyRey ($207.55 in chips) Seat 2: badbeaxbob2 ($503.10 in chips) Seat 3: jaxetlee123 ($1036 in chips) Seat 4: filxtofish ($710.05 in chips) Seat 5: Paxaa ($382 in chips) Seat 6: too eazy ($402 in chips) Seat 7: xhwe ($622 in chips) Seat 8: DumbNoob ($477.35 in chips) Seat 9: Alpxxfxl ($482.40 in chips) too eazy: posts small blind $2 jahwe: posts big blind $4 *** HOLE CARDS *** Dealt to too eazy [As Kd] DumbNoob: raises $8 to $12 Alxvxvfoil: folds SoxcxcyRey: folds badxcxcxob2: calls $12 xvvxvlee123: folds fixvxvxtofish: folds Paaapaa: folds too eazy: raises $40 to $52 jassdaswe: folds DumbNoob: calls $40 basadasdbob2: folds *** FLOP *** [Js 5c 9c] too eazy: bets $78 DumbNoob: calls $78 *** TURN *** [Js 5c 9c] [8s] too eazy: checks DumbNoob: checks *** RIVER *** [Js 5c 9c 8s] [Kc] too eazy: bets $272 and is all-in |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 400 NL - LITTLE HELP HERE?
I don't like it.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 400 NL - LITTLE HELP HERE?
[ QUOTE ]
I don't like it. [/ QUOTE ] CARE TO [censored] ELABORATE? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 400 NL - LITTLE HELP HERE?
I don't know about the push on the river. What hand that is losing is calling? The king also brought the only draw. Thats a tough spot on the river, not saying I know anything thats better. Everything else I like.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 400 NL - LITTLE HELP HERE?
[ QUOTE ]
I don't like it. [/ QUOTE ] [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 400 NL - LITTLE HELP HERE?
i agree - it's hard to imagine anyone calling with a worst hand than AK here.
Though of course, it could beat a really poorly played set of Jacks. but not betting the turn on that board is well, bad, and with 13/10/2 stats, all indicaitons are that he would. What range do we put villian on here? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 400 NL - LITTLE HELP HERE?
I think its standard tbh.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 400 NL - LITTLE HELP HERE?
[ QUOTE ]
I think its standard tbh. [/ QUOTE ] Why? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 400 NL - LITTLE HELP HERE?
I can't think of any hands you're getting value from with a shove here, so the only reasons to shove are A - to move him off a better hand which I don't think you're attempting, or B - to look like a bluff which gets him to call with QQ, which he prob won't.
The best options to me are A) value betting to get value from TT/QQ which would prob check behind on riv , or B) check calling to induce a bluff, or lose the least to better hand. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 400 NL - LITTLE HELP HERE?
You usually have the best hand, but I'm not sure how often you're going to get called by worse.
It's ok as a range-merger I guess, but I don't love it. I think I'd check and expect to be good usually. |
|
|