|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
HUNL article
link
This is an excellent article. I began working on this theory in my pooh-bah post and have since expanded it a little further than the point this article presents. I am still working on the full implications, and trying to resolve a GT model for a tricky player. For obvious reasons, my initiative has not been strong. I presently use this theory and concept to good effect. Since the cat is out of the bag, I will suggest that every one reads this and apply it. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: HUNL article
Pretty good article, but it's generally unwise to keep everything you do a standard because you almost never play the same person twice.
At the nosebleed limits I can see this article not applying, but obviously articles aren't written for 1100 husng winners. Overall, I felt it was very well written and made some good points about not restricting yourself to certain plays and about adjusting in different ways to different opponents. I think the article will help a fair amount of people. Well done Fred Bush, whoever you are (does anybody know who this is?). |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: HUNL article
Fred Bush is creedofhubris. I don't remember if there are caps in there or not.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: HUNL article
Sorry, I was reading this in a nltrn frame of mind.
I suppose the article is stronger when applied in a cash mindset, I'll reread it later. Either way, nh Creed, I thought it was a very solid article. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: HUNL article
[ QUOTE ]
Sorry, I was reading this in a nltrn frame of mind. I suppose the article is stronger when applied in a cash mindset, I'll reread it later. Either way, nh Creed, I thought it was a very solid article. [/ QUOTE ] Thanks. Sometimes I tend to forget the HU SNG guys are out there; I should have made it more clear that, as usual, I'm primarily writing about cash games. |
|
|