|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Improving the pass interference rule in the NFL
There's been some discussion in various threads about pass interference and reforming the rule. I don't think you can completely get rid of the "spot of the foul and auto first down," but I think it can be changed a bit. What do you all think of this:
- Change both off. pass interference and def. pass interference into major and minor fouls (like a personal foul for grabbing the face mask) - For def. pass interference, major PI continues to be spot of foul and auto first down. Minor PI is fifteen yards (or spot of foul if shorter) and auto first down. - For off. pass interference, major PI (tackling a defender who has a sure shot at an interception, for example) is 10 yards and a loss of down. Minor pass interference continues to be a standard 10 yard penalty. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Improving the pass interference rule in the NFL
I think the most important thing is that all crews of officials call it the same.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Improving the pass interference rule in the NFL
I don't know how many of you guys are that "old", since the group here tends to skew younger than normal....but if you remember the late '80s and early '90s when PI was all the rage, it certainly seems to be LEAPS and BOUNDS better nowadays how the refs call the games in regards to PI, rather than tossing a hanky on even the slightest contact.
Christ, once upon a time if you so much as breathed on guys like Mark Duper or Ernest Givens, it was a guarenteed flag. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Improving the pass interference rule in the NFL
[ QUOTE ]
I don't know how many of you guys are that "old", since the group here tends to skew younger than normal....but if you remember the late '80s and early '90s when PI was all the rage, it certainly seems to be LEAPS and BOUNDS better nowadays how the refs call the games in regards to PI, rather than tossing a hanky on even the slightest contact. Christ, once upon a time if you so much as breathed on guys like Mark Duper or Ernest Givens, it was a guarenteed flag. [/ QUOTE ] Just because a rule is leaps and bounds better than it used to be, doesn't mean it's perfect. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Improving the pass interference rule in the NFL
[ QUOTE ]
There's been some discussion in various threads about pass interference and reforming the rule. I don't think you can completely get rid of the "spot of the foul and auto first down," but I think it can be changed a bit. What do you all think of this: - Change both off. pass interference and def. pass interference into major and minor fouls (like a personal foul for grabbing the face mask) - For def. pass interference, major PI continues to be spot of foul and auto first down. Minor PI is fifteen yards (or spot of foul if shorter) and auto first down. - For off. pass interference, major PI (tackling a defender who has a sure shot at an interception, for example) is 10 yards and a loss of down. Minor pass interference continues to be a standard 10 yard penalty. [/ QUOTE ] Sounds good but I have no faith in the current crop of officials to distinguish between major and minor. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Improving the pass interference rule in the NFL
[ QUOTE ]
Sounds good but I have no faith in the current crop of officials to distinguish between major and minor. [/ QUOTE ] They seem to do well with incidental and major face masks, no? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Improving the pass interference rule in the NFL
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Sounds good but I have no faith in the current crop of officials to distinguish between major and minor. [/ QUOTE ] They seem to do well with incidental and major face masks, no? [/ QUOTE ] That's a lot easier to discern. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Improving the pass interference rule in the NFL
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Sounds good but I have no faith in the current crop of officials to distinguish between major and minor. [/ QUOTE ] They seem to do well with incidental and major face masks, no? [/ QUOTE ] That's a lot easier to discern. [/ QUOTE ] Meh. I don't necessarily agree. A lot of facemaks take place in scrums or in situations of high action, while most PI takes in a one-on-one situation and at least one official has a good vantage point. I don't think the refs would have ruled either PI on NE as a major foul. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Improving the pass interference rule in the NFL
mikey,
as i said to triumph in the other thread, i like it. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Improving the pass interference rule in the NFL
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Sounds good but I have no faith in the current crop of officials to distinguish between major and minor. [/ QUOTE ] They seem to do well with incidental and major face masks, no? [/ QUOTE ] That's a lot easier to discern. [/ QUOTE ] Meh. I don't necessarily agree. A lot of facemaks take place in scrums or in situations of high action, while most PI takes in a one-on-one situation and at least one official has a good vantage point. I don't think the refs would have ruled either PI on NE as a major foul. [/ QUOTE ] The facemask rule is clearly defined. 5 yards: Grasping facemask of the ball carrier or quarterback. 15 Yards: Twisting, turning, or pulling an opponent by the facemask. Dividing PI into multiple categories isn't going to be nearly so clearcut. |
|
|