|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
luckyjimm banned
wow i feel like im stepping my foot in a lot of other mods business these days ROFL... i think this is #5 in like a week
why is luckyjimm banned? his post was clearly a joke?? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: luckyjimm banned
You saw the ATF thread right? Gild reduced the ban as a result. Mike added to it because he circumvented the ban to complain in ATF. Final ban length: it expires around midnight EST today.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: luckyjimm banned
wow, really stupid bad
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: luckyjimm banned
[ QUOTE ]
You saw the ATF thread right? Gild reduced the ban as a result. Mike added to it because he circumvented the ban to complain in ATF. Final ban length: it expires around midnight EST today. [/ QUOTE ] This doesn't quite read as events happened. luckyjimm complained about a two days ban, (although it was actually three days), by posting in ATF with his Jim_Dixon account. Because of an old post by Ryan, I added 2.5 days to the ban, which had 2.5 days remaining when I looked at it. Standard. I wasn't concerned with the rights or wrongs of the original ban. GW must have decided his ban was too harsh in the first place, so he reduced the total ban to 0.5 days from the time of his amendment. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: luckyjimm banned
Dibs,
lj imo provides a real resource to the forums by railing the high stakes games seemingly 24/7. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: luckyjimm banned
El D,
If cts managed to go bust as suggested in recent thread without anybody noticing, I will have to agree. Prior to that it was my assumption that jim wasn't the only one. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: luckyjimm banned
[ QUOTE ]
GW must have decided his ban was too harsh in the first place, so he reduced the total ban to 0.5 days from the time of his amendment. [/ QUOTE ] this wouldn't have happened if he didn't complain what was he supposed to do, banning someone for making a legit complaint about their original ban is ridiculous |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: luckyjimm banned
[ QUOTE ]
Dibs, lj imo provides a real resource to the forums by railing the high stakes games seemingly 24/7. [/ QUOTE ] total agreement. he also has a somewhat ridiculous knowledge of who the players are on various sites, their histories, etc. on top of that he seems like an agreeable guy almost always, so if you just said "hey jim what would you think of like, a weekly hs rail thread?" he's just stick to one thread, i would wager. he sucks so much less than the majority of nvg posters it's funny. lol 4am in vegasaments. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: luckyjimm banned
the issue was resolved as far as I'm concerned
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: luckyjimm banned
Nobody could have done NVG a favor and accidentially forgot to set a ban length huh?
lj never does anything ban worthy, but he does a lot of sucking. |
|
|