|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
50NL: I 4bet QQ against TAG
Villain is a TAG regular. I have him running around 24/18, but only 50 hands at the table. I am running around 22/18.
Note stacks sizes. I make a standard LP raise from the CO. Villain 3 bets me from the BU. This is the first time he has 3 bet. I think his range is pretty wide, since I have been raising from LP a lot. I decided to 4 bet, rather than play it OOP. Villain then shoves. Now after he shoves I'm basically putting him on QQ+ and AK so I fold. Do you like 4 betting here? Do you like the size of my 4 bet? Thoughts on making this fold? Full Tilt Poker, $0.25/$0.50 NL Hold'em Cash Game, 6 Players LeggoPoker Hand History Converter BB: $50 UTG: $48.50 MP: $43.20 Hero (CO): $67.10 BTN: $87.30 SB: $49.10 Pre-Flop: Q[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] Q dealt to Hero (CO) 2 folds, <font color="red">Hero raises to $1.75</font>, <font color="red">BTN raises to $6</font>, 2 folds, <font color="red">Hero raises to $16</font>, <font color="red">BTN raises to $87.30 and is All-In</font>, Hero folds |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 50NL: I 4bet QQ against TAG
Seems fine... If he just calls what's your plan for the flop?
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 50NL: I 4bet QQ against TAG
[ QUOTE ]
If he just calls what's your plan for the flop? [/ QUOTE ] Stack off. [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img] |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 50NL: I 4bet QQ against TAG
Not liking the 4-bet against someone who has never 3-bet you before. When you 4-bet him you are basically inviting a shove or a fold. I'd rather just call his 3-bet and go from there.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 50NL: I 4bet QQ against TAG
[ QUOTE ]
Not liking the 4-bet against someone who has never 3-bet you before. When you 4-bet him you are basically inviting a shove or a fold. I'd rather just call his 3-bet and go from there. [/ QUOTE ] I pretty much wanted him to fold. I don't mind taking the pot down preflop. He's a decent player so it's going to hard to win much OOP if I'm ahead. My default is to usually call, but I've been mixing in 4 bets lately against the TAG regs. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 50NL: I 4bet QQ against TAG
If you want to mix it up I'd rather 4-bet with a junky hand rather than a hand with value like QQ. Most TAGs aren't going to be calling a 4-bet with anything you beat without some serious history. So if he folds you got him to fold a hand like JJ or TT, and if he calls he almost always has AA,KK. Just a huge waste IMO.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 50NL: I 4bet QQ against TAG
Man hell yeah, i love the 4-bet like a fat kid likes fatty fat fat stuff.
I was just gonna make a post about how i feel the 4-bet has gone outta style at the tables, everyone 4-bets all-in, but nobody 4-BETs, you know what i mean? i was gonna pose the question - when are we 4-betting but not all in? I think the 4-bet is solid gold. But - What if i always 4-bet all in with JJ+ Think about Shania with this one too - My first 4-bet all in is with QQ say. Sheer luck its against a nit with J10s. (That last statement is integral i think to our answer) Next time I 4 bet all-in, I'm going to save it for my premium hands, AA, KK, AKs. Now my 4-bet all in represent a wider range than just KK+ say. What if i did it with JJ the first time? Is JJ too big a risk to 4-bet all in? I think Jacks are underestimated as a pocket pair personally, I go nuts with Jacks because Jacks are the nuts at these limits. I think people are overestimating their unmade connectors at this limit moreso than playing their pocket pairs hard. Does this include the TAGs? I'd have to go over my PT database, but recently I busted heads with my 99 against a TAG who 4-bet me all-in with AKo (i had a better read on the situation than it seems with only that last situation along with other metagame b.s. etcs) Maybe at NL50 this is pointless to worry about. Against a TAG, would we be able to pull this off? I think i still stand by the 4-bet vs the 4-bet all-in, but I would want to hear other people's thoughts on proper PF conditions that would warrant the 4-bet VS the 4-bet all in. I hate to conclude with this, but it I think its 100% true: if you don't have a read on your opponent, that 4-bet is better than a 4-bet all in, you're saving some money. And by read, i mean more than just x/x/x numbers. I would want to see some showdown data on the mf'er. seacrest out. |
|
|