|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
NL 200, squeeze with 44 on button?
UTG is 35/15, CO is 19/16 with a preflop aggression factor of 4. Thought a squeeze play in this spot is fine, since UTGs range is wide and aggressive CO would raise very good hands.
Party Poker, $1/$2 NL Hold'em Cash Game, 5 Players LeggoPoker.com - Hand History Converter Hero (BTN): $196 SB: $352 BB: $220.55 UTG: $203 CO: $200 Pre-Flop: 4[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 4[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] dealt to Hero (BTN) <font color="red">UTG raises to $7</font>, CO calls $7, <font color="red">Hero raises to $22</font>, 2 folds, UTG calls $15, CO calls $15 Flop: ($69) 5[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] 3[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 3[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] (3 Players) UTG checks, CO checks, <font color="red">Hero bets $40</font>, 2 folds ok, my raise size is arguably not high enough, but a small raise is a good way to pretend a big pair?! Thoughts on the hand, too risky with 44? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL 200, squeeze with 44 on button?
Don't love it but don't hate it. Agree that flop bet sizing is wrong.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL 200, squeeze with 44 on button?
thought my preflop raise is too low, not flop bet. The flop is very dry, if i bet little more than half pot on flop most hands will fold. Maybe pocket pairs from 66-99 also fold, and if i get raised i can easily lay down my hand without having invested too much on conti bet.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL 200, squeeze with 44 on button?
Actually yeah, your squeeze should be at least 28.
And betting half pot will not definitely fold out overpairs. You can't make it look like a scared bet, so betting to fold is a bad reason. You have to bet like you would if you had the hand you're representing. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL 200, squeeze with 44 on button?
I guess it's okay but set mining in a multiway pot in position is way more profitable.
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|