|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
NL50, JJ gets limp reraised by second limper
NL50, no read on the UTG+1, Button could have pretty much any two.
Does people really do this with AA-QQ? I`m mostly a tournament player and when poeople do this they pretty much always have mid pp, AJ or KQ kind of hands. UTG ($64) UTG+1 ($37) MP ($36) Button ($50.5) Hero ($48.5) BB ($48.5) Preflop: Hero is SB with J[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] J[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]. UTG calls $0.50, UTG+1 calls $0.50, MP folds, Button calls $0.50, <font color="red"> Hero raises to $3.5</font>, BB folds, UTG folds, <font color="red"> UTG+1 raises to $6.5</font>, Button calls $6.5, Hero? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL50, JJ gets limp reraised by second limper
Second limper or not, limp re raises are almost exclusively AA and KK, but much more skewed towards AA. I have seen people limp the button and re raise, thinking they are getting all tricky. Of course I tell myself theres no way thats AA, but then they show me AA obviously. I fold here without a read.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL50, JJ gets limp reraised by second limper
I agree this is likely AA/KK but disagree on the fold. The RR is way too small and with BTN calling this is a call for set value.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL50, JJ gets limp reraised by second limper
Oh whoops sorry, I didnt see the button called, then yea this is a clear call but only for set value. Please dont stack off when the flop comes 822.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL50, JJ gets limp reraised by second limper
call for set value obv.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL50, JJ gets limp reraised by second limper
[ QUOTE ]
call for set value obv. [/ QUOTE ] And you are getting set value paying $3 into $20. I'm usually turfing this hand on flop if I don't hit btw. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|