|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
NL 100 - TPTK marginal spot
Full Tilt Poker, $0.50/$1 NL Hold'em Cash Game, 7 Players
LegoPoker Hand History Converter BTN: $78.60 SB: $149.50 BB: $97.90 Hero (UTG): $109.35 UTG+1: $26 MP: $44.55 CO: $100 Pre-Flop: A[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] K[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] dealt to Hero (UTG) <font color="red">Hero raises to $3.50</font>, 4 folds, SB calls $3, BB folds Flop: ($8) 4[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] Q[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] K[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (2 Players) SB checks, <font color="red">Hero bets $6</font>, <font color="red">SB raises to $15</font>, Hero calls $9 Turn: ($38) 4[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] (2 Players) <font color="red">SB bets $24</font>, Hero calls $24 River: ($86) 5[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] (2 Players) <font color="red">SB bets $86</font>, Hero ???? villain is 21/9/2 put him either 44/KQ/AK on flop then when the 4 paired on turn i ruled out 44. should i have still folded on turn as his AF is only 2??? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL 100 - TPTK marginal spot
this is pretty meh. do you have any kind of notes or gut feelings about the villain? i think i just fold this river, as the only hands i can put him on that we dont lose to are AK or air, like j 10 or something. i probably play the hand before the river the same FWIW
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL 100 - TPTK marginal spot
Looks like KQ. I think I'd fold it as it's such a strong line.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL 100 - TPTK marginal spot
[ QUOTE ]
put him either 44/KQ/AK on flop [/ QUOTE ] so with only 26% equity against his range why call on the flop? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL 100 - TPTK marginal spot
Your hand is pretty obvious, so he is loudly declaring that (a) he can beat AK/AA, and (b) his has isn't strong enough to slowplay to the turn.
So probably 2p. Unless you have reason to think that he would bluff this hard, or play a JT draw this hard (and it doesn't sound like you do), he pretty much has you beat. I think your two choices are folding on the flop, maybe turn, or 3-bet the flop hard to represent a monster. The latter option also assumes something about the size of your underpants. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL 100 - TPTK marginal spot
[ QUOTE ]
3-bet the flop hard to represent a monster. The latter option also assumes something about the size of your underpants. [/ QUOTE ] top 2 or set doesn't fold nearly often enough to risk $100 for $29 |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL 100 - TPTK marginal spot
[ QUOTE ]
Your hand is pretty obvious, so he is loudly declaring that (a) he can beat AK/AA , [/ QUOTE ] u do realize that AA is a HUUUUUUUUUUUGE difference here, right? give the board pair down low as played....i hate this spot. i think im folding the river. strength of villians line is crazy. and i agree that range on the flop is KQ/44 often. i dont rly think AK is there tho. so ur pretty smoked on the flop. i guess i fold the turn being i cant see us beating much more than JT, which i dont think we will b shown here nearly enuff to turn a profit |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL 100 - TPTK marginal spot
as played I fold the turn. you beat nothing but KJ/air and I don't think villain shows up with those a lot taking this line.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL 100 - TPTK marginal spot
normally i would fold turn but as bottom card paired does that not take 44 out of the equation??
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL 100 - TPTK marginal spot
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] put him either 44/KQ/AK on flop [/ QUOTE ] so with only 26% equity against his range why call on the flop? [/ QUOTE ] This was my first thought. I may add J10 to his range also. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|