|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
possibly bizzare scenario, little help
6handed table, what hand range is a +EV call if the 5 people ahead of you shove? (So, what hand range shows ~17%+ profit vs 5 random hands?)
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: possibly bizzare scenario, little help
Assuming equal stacks and a standard 6-max payout structure of 65%/35% for 1st and 2nd, I can't see much being +EV to call with. Folding, your equity is about 40% of the tournament prize pool. So to call, you would need to win something pretty close 2/3 of the time to get more than 40% equity by calling (also this makes the assumption that if you call and lose you will be busted and never get the second place money).
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: possibly bizzare scenario, little help
This depends a lot on stacksizes, doesn't it?
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: possibly bizzare scenario, little help
Bobbo,
What ranges are they shoving? What are blinds and stack sizes? What's the payout structure? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: possibly bizzare scenario, little help
[ QUOTE ]
Bobbo, What ranges are they shoving? What are blinds and stack sizes? What's the payout structure? [/ QUOTE ] Cash game so no payout structure, we assume ATC. The situation I'm describing is an all-in blind where everyone BUT YOU agrees, what hands show profit. There is a reason to this because it links with cash theory but it's somewhat complicated (and I need to know the initial answer before I can determine the link!!!) |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: possibly bizzare scenario, little help
ben/matt/nate - thanks guys [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: possibly bizzare scenario, little help
[ QUOTE ]
This depends a lot on stacksizes, doesn't it? [/ QUOTE ] Very much so. I made a lot of simplifying assumptions in my answer above. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: possibly bizzare scenario, little help
[ QUOTE ]
Assuming equal stacks and a standard 6-max payout structure of 65%/35% for 1st and 2nd, I can't see much being +EV to call with. Folding, your equity is about 40% of the tournament prize pool. So to call, you would need to win something pretty close 2/3 of the time to get more than 40% equity by calling (also this makes the assumption that if you call and lose you will be busted and never get the second place money). [/ QUOTE ] no no you dont understand, I mean in cash game, no pay out, so this isn't ICM. Just simply what range figures to be minimum 17% equity vs 5 other random hands. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: possibly bizzare scenario, little help
[ QUOTE ]
6handed table, what hand range is a +EV call if the 5 people ahead of you shove? (So, what hand range shows ~17%+ profit vs 5 random hands?) [/ QUOTE ] nice avatar |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: possibly bizzare scenario, little help
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] 6handed table, what hand range is a +EV call if the 5 people ahead of you shove? (So, what hand range shows ~17%+ profit vs 5 random hands?) [/ QUOTE ] excellent avatar [/ QUOTE ] |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|