give me a range of hands that played this hand well..

[jfish]

ok, so what hands, given my line, played this well? wuddacooler is 20/16 and toward passive side. ive been very aggro vs him to the point of spewing, but im not sure how fed up he is of me. he doesnt seem to get out of line ever (???).

oh and also give me a range that you put me on here. im 22/18 toward aggro side.


Full Tilt Poker, $10/$20 NL Hold'em Cash Game, 6 Players
LegoPoker Hand History Converter

MP: $1,704
Hero (CO): $2,378.50
BTN: $3,586.50
SB: $577
BB: $2,000
UTG: $2,802

Pre-Flop: XX dealt to Hero (CO)
2 folds, <font color="red">Hero raises to $70</font>, BTN calls $70, 2 folds

Flop: ($170) T[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 6[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] 7[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (2 Players)
Hero checks, <font color="red">BTN bets $120</font>, <font color="red">Hero raises to $420</font>, BTN calls $300

Turn: ($1,010) 6[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (2 Players)
<font color="red">Hero bets $740</font>, BTN calls $740

River: ($2,490) 3[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (2 Players)
<font color="red">Hero bets $1,148.50 and is All-In</font>

[jj12]

89/overpairs/AT. Flop line is good with a monster because it looks super fishy.

[DJ Sensei]

i'd say AA/KK, sets. with QQ, JJ, AT, or two pairses, i'd probably lead flop to avoid letting him see a free one. once he bets flop though, this is fine with anything JJ+. and AT i guess, since thats pretty much JJ.

shouldnt ever be a bluff on river obv, since i can't imagine folding is his plan. unless he's the kind of guy to think "that river bet can't ever be a bluff" and will then fold tens and such. but meh, thats generally overthinking it unless theres history or something.

[king_of_drafts]

AT or better are fine

[bigt2k4]

TT or 66 since he has 77

[Kilay]

I don't know, am I way off here when I say I can't see this be anything else than 89 or a set ?? I mean throw in an overpair but I think at least I would lead out with an overpair because the board is too draw heavy and since I am OOP I wouldn't want to give him a free card and since he is on the passive side planning a C/R isn't probably the best thing to do at that point... So I'd say 89/set...

Please, correct me if I am wrong but don't you want to have some more pot control when you have a hand like AT here since some people mentioned that as a possible hand, I mean when a passive calls you on the turn there aren't you behind on his range, hence a river shove doesn't sound very smart...

[Isura]

AT+ is fine as drafts mentioned. But he can have JJ-AA pretty often when you get action, so it's probably better to tighten up a bit to like QQ+. Something like T9/T8 some % of the time too.

[the_dal_kid]

[ QUOTE ]
TT or 66 since he has 77

[/ QUOTE ]

Er, yea, I was thinkin the same thing.

[recallme]

Like said, this should nevr be a bluff. I would lik to know, if the was some histoy that made you chck this flop?
You said you hav bn petty aggro, so i don`t get why you slowd down with your monster.

[br.bm]

TT+, 77, 66, AT, 98, 67, 54

The flop confuses me. I guess you prefere to c/c the flop with one pair hands for pot controll or bet out for protection.
If villian was aggro I definatly put onepair in your range. Because he is passive (--&gt; he would call your value bets with a draw or one pair and would probably check hands behind that you beat) I'd rule your one pair hands out (while talking about "played good"; they are still in your range though)

I guess we should c/r sets, the str8 and a draw. We c/r with the made hands to build a pot just in case he likes his hand.
If we check and he checks behind he may turn something worth a turn and river call.
Also draws can be played like this ("gimme free! ... no? then fold! ... oh wait I hit, gimme your stack!")