|
|
#1
10-01-2007, 07:36 PM
|
|||
|
|||
All skins in networks have shared small stakes games?
I'm just wondering if skins in networks share their traffic on small stakes games as well. Or do they separate them since every skin has enough of them on their own?
|
|
#3
10-01-2007, 08:18 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: All skins in networks have shared small stakes games?
Sure is. A few years ago when I played on Unibet I found out that other skins had other players. I changed skins found out that the competition is easier. Wondering if sites still do it like that.
|
|
#5
10-01-2007, 09:37 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: All skins in networks have shared small stakes games?
[ QUOTE ]
I'm just wondering if skins in networks share their traffic on small stakes games as well. [/ QUOTE ] i've always assumed that they all do - party and empire certainly do. out of curiosity, i once tried haing my empire account on one pc join a table with my party account (another pc) and it was correctly blocked. [ QUOTE ] Or do they separate them since every skin has enough of them on their own? [/ QUOTE ] I don't understand what the point of separating the games would be.
|
|
#6
10-01-2007, 11:31 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: All skins in networks have shared small stakes games?
[ QUOTE ]
I'm just wondering if skins in networks share their traffic on small stakes games as well. Or do they separate them since every skin has enough of them on their own? [/ QUOTE ] Most share the same players. However on Crypto, Will Hill has some tables that are not shared with the other Crypto sites.
|
|
#7
10-02-2007, 12:09 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: All skins in networks have shared small stakes games?
unibet got own tables up to 2/4NL. But unibet is almost big enough to have their own platform
Thats the only one I know about. Separating tables would just suck. I dont see any upside to that.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
